Conservation of Energy and Gravitation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy in two scenarios: a block sliding on a track and the gravitational effects of a ring on a particle. For the block, the initial kinetic energy from a height of 0.1m is equated to the work done by friction as it slides along a flat portion with a coefficient of friction of 0.15. It is concluded that the block will traverse the flat section multiple times before coming to rest, approximately 0.07m from the starting point. In the second scenario, participants discuss calculating the gravitational force exerted by a ring on a particle and emphasize the need to sum forces and consider potential energy changes accurately. The conversation highlights the importance of integrating forces and using correct expressions for gravitational potential energy in non-uniform fields.
Destrio
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
1. A block slides along a track with elevated ends. The flat part has length L = 0.2m, and the object is released from a height of 0.1m. The curved portion of the track is frictionless, but the flat part has uk = 0.15 . where does the object finally come to rest?

Etotal = Ui + Ki = Uf + Kf + work done by friction
mgy + 0 = mgy' + 0 + ukFn
mg(.1) = mgy' + (.15)mg
.1 = y' + .15
y' = -.05

this doesn't seem right, will I have to do multiple calculations of conservation of energy, since there is a section with friction and a section without. Do I have to consider angular momentum since its sliding down a slope at first?


2. Several planets possesses nearly circular surrounding rings, perhaps composed of material that failed to form a satellite. In addition, many galaxies contain ring-like structures. Consider a homogeneous ring of mass M and radius R.
a) Find an expression for the gravitational force exerted by the ring on a particle of mass m located a distance x from the center of the ring along its axis.
b) Suppose that the particle falls from rest as a result of the attraction of the ring of matter. Find an expression for the speed with which is passes through the center of the ring.

since we are dealing with a ring, should I use inertia of the ring instead of mass?

F = -GMm/r^2
I of ring = mr^2

F = -G(MR^2)m/x^2

W = Fd = -G(MR^2)m/x

Etotal = U - K
-G(MR^2)m/x = (1/2)mv^2
v = -sqrt(2G(MR^2)/x)

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.The initial KE at the start of the flat portion is equal to the energy gained after dropping through a height of 0.1 m. This KE will be equal to work done by friction in bringing it to rest. Equate the two.

2. a) This has got nothing to do with MI. All the points on the ring is at an equal dist from any pt on the axis. You know the dist. Just sum the forces. Only the components of the forces along the axis will remain. The components perp to the axis will cancel out for diametrically opp points.

2. b) Can you find the potential at any point along the axis? Remember, force = -grad phi. After that, final E = initial E, because gravitation is a conservative force.
 
Last edited:
1.
mgh = kf = work done by friction to bring it to rest
mgh = fd
mgh = uk*n*d
mgh = uk*mg*d
h = uk*d
d = h/uk
d = .67

but this is greater than the length, so will the brick go upt he other side?
would i have to do this a few times and add the energies lost each time?2.
a) -GMm/x^2
is this all I need to leave it at?

b)
U = mgx
mgx = 0 when x = 0
so when U = 0
K = mgx
mv^2 = mgx
v = sqrt(gx)

is this correct?

thanks
 
(Hi, posting problems separately makes it easier for all to share in the helping.)

1. Right. Since the elevated ends will not take away energy, it seems the mass will traverse the flat portion three times and after that will come to rest 0.07 m from the
other end than from which it started.

2a. No, you have to sum it and express it in terms of x, M and R. Draw a diagram. Remember that the dist d of the pt P on the axis from a pt on the ring is given by
d^2=R^2+x^2. Take component of the force at P along and perp to axis.

2b. No, the U you've written is for uniform g field. You have to use the force you get from 2a and integrate. Do 2a first.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top