Conservation of energy - find speed of block

AI Thread Summary
A 2.4 kg block dropped from a height of 5 m compresses a spring by 25 cm when momentarily at rest. The problem involves calculating the block's speed when the spring is compressed by 15 cm. The initial potential energy is calculated as 117.72 J, but confusion arises regarding the spring's contribution since the spring constant is not provided. The conservation of energy principle is applied, leading to discussions about the potential energy of the spring and gravitational energy, but the final calculations yield different results than the expected 10 m/s. The conversation highlights the complexities of incorporating spring dynamics into energy conservation equations.
man_in_motion
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.4kg block is dropped onto a spring from hieght of 5m. When the block is momentarily at rest, the spring is compressed 25cm. Find the speed of the block when the compression of the spring is 15cm.
answer: 10m/s


Homework Equations


K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2
U_g=mgh
<br /> \Delta U = \Delta K<br />


The Attempt at a Solution


U_o=mgh=2.4kg(9.81m/s^2)(5m)=117.72J
since all the potential energy gets converted into kinetic energy
117.72J=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 then I solve for v and plug the numbers in. I get the right answer but I know I'm doing it wrong because I'm not sure how to take the spring into acount, especially when the springs constant isn't given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi man_in_motion! :smile:
man_in_motion said:
A 2.4kg block is dropped onto a spring from hieght of 5m. When the block is momentarily at rest, the spring is compressed 25cm. Find the speed of the block when the compression of the spring is 15cm.
answer: 10m/s

U_o=mgh=2.4kg(9.81m/s^2)(5m)=117.72J
since all the potential energy gets converted into kinetic energy
117.72J=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 then I solve for v and plug the numbers in. I get the right answer but I know I'm doing it wrong because I'm not sure how to take the spring into acount, especially when the springs constant isn't given.

No, you probably are doing it right.

You don't need to use k, because mgh = 1/2 k 252, and the other PE is 1/2 k 152, so the ks cancel. :wink:
 
thanks tiny-tim, though I'm still not entirley convinced.
consider:
K_f-K_o = K_f = U_f-U_o=U_f_g+U_f_s-U_g_o=(mg(0.25m)+\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{mg}{0.25m}0.15^2m)-mg(5m)=\frac{1}{2}mv^2

Then I solve for v and I get
<br /> v=\sqrt{\frac{2(mg(0.25)+\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{mg}{0.25} \cdot 0.15 - mg(5))}{m}}<br />
granted now I no longer get 10m/s, but the answer key could be wrong. what do you think?
 
Hi man_in_motion! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

Sorry, I don't understand your first line. :confused:
 
Energy is conserved
<br /> K_f+U_f=K_o+U_o<br />
<br /> K_0<br /> goes to 0 and rewriting the equation we get K_f=U_o-U_f=\Delta U
Initially there is only potential energy due to gravity, when the block is in the air
U_o_g=mgy=2.4kg(9.81m/s^2)5m
There are 2 final potential energies: one for the gravity and one for the spring
<br /> U_f_g=mgy=2.4kg(9.81m/s^2)(-0.15m)<br />
<br /> U_f_s=\frac{1}{2}kx^2=\frac{1}{2}k(0.15m)^2<br />
We don't know k (spring constant) so we need to figure it out using Newton's 2nd law when the block is momentarily at rest

<br /> \Sigma F_y=ma_y=0=mg-k(0.25)=(2.4kg)(9.81m/s^2)-k(0.25m)=0<br />
solving for k I get
<br /> k=\frac{(2.4kg)(9.81m/s^2)}{(0.25m)}<br />

Now we know
<br /> U_f_s=\frac{1}{2}\frac{mg}{0.25} \cdot (0.15m)^2<br />

Plugging things into the first equation

<br /> K_f=U_f-U_o=mg(0.25m)+\frac{1}{2}\frac{mg}{0.25} \cdot (0.15m)^2-mg(5m) = \frac{1}{2}mv^2<br />

sovling for v from the right side of the equation gives
<br /> v=\sqrt{\frac{2(mg(0.25)+\frac{1}{2}(0.15m)^2-mg(5m))}{m}<br />
but this gives me the wrong answer

If I have m following a constant (namley 0.25, 0.15 or 5) it stands for meters (the unit) other wise it's for mass of the block.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top