Conservation of Energy Help (p2)

AI Thread Summary
To determine the height from which a compact car must be dropped to match its kinetic energy at 105 km/h, the conservation of energy principle is applied. The kinetic energy (K) is calculated using the formula K = 1/2mv^2, and potential energy (U) is expressed as U = mg(delta h). The user attempted to equate gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy, simplifying the equation by canceling mass. However, there was a critical error in converting the speed from kilometers per hour to meters per second, leading to an incorrect height calculation. Accurate unit conversion is essential for solving the problem correctly.
kissafilipino
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



From what height would a compact car have to be dropped to have the same kinetic energy that it has when being driven at 105 km/h? Unless otherwise directed, assume that air resistance is negligible.

Answer: __ m
Velocity: 105 km/h -> 105000 m/s

Height: ?



Homework Equations


Conservation of energy equation: (thanks to user MillerGenuine)
U= potential energy
K= kinetic energy
Conservation of
energy => Kf + Uf = Ki + Ui

K = 1/2mv^2
U = mg(delta h)


The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt was somewhat he same trying to input in the equation, what height = the same kinetic energy of 115 k/m. So I said, gravitational potential energy = kinetic energy
U = K
mg(delta h) = (1/2)mv^2
Since mass is in both sides, it can be taken out.
g(delta h) = (1/2)v^2
(9.81)(delta h) = (1/2)105000^2
(9.81)(delta h) = (1/2)11025000000
(9.81)(delta h) = 5512500000
delta h = 561926605 m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep your units straight. Kilometers/hour is not SI units.
 
Exactly, that I understood, which is why I changed it from Km to meters
105 km/h -> 105000 m/s and used it in the equation: mg(delta h) = (1/2)mv^2
 
You changed km -> m but didn't correctly change hours -> seconds. 105km/h is about the speed a car is driven. Does your speed sound reasonable?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top