Conservation of Energy in Conjunction With Momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an elastic collision between two bodies of equal mass, where one body is initially at rest. Participants are tasked with deriving the conditions for conservation of momentum and energy, and proving that the resulting velocities are orthogonal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of conservation equations and the relationship between the magnitudes of velocity vectors. There is exploration of the law of cosines and its application to the problem, with questions about the angle between the vectors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints and corrections regarding the application of vector magnitudes and the law of cosines. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between the vectors, but no consensus has been reached on the final proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding terminology, such as the distinction between the law of cosines and the dot product. There is also mention of the need for clarity in applying mathematical principles to the problem.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Consider an elastic collision between two bodies of equal mass, one of which is initially at rest. Let their velocities be \vec{v_1} and \vec{v_2} = \vec{0} before the collision, and \vec{v_1 '} and \vec{v_2 '} after the collision. Write down the vector equation representing conservation of momentum and the scalar equation which expresses that the collision is elastic. Use these to prove that \vec{v_1 '} and \vec{v_2 '} are orthogonal.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



If the collision is elastic, then KE = KE'.

m1 = m2 = m

\vec{p} = \vec{p'}

If the two velocity vectors are orthogonal, then \vec{v_1 '} \cdot \vec{v_2 '} = 0.

Conservation of energy:

\frac{1}{2} mv_1^2 = \frac{1}{2} m v_1^{'2} + \frac{1}{2} m v_2^{'2}

v_1^2 = v_1^{'2} + v_2^{'2}, which can be written as | \vec{v_1} |^2 =| \vec{v_1 '} |^2 + | \vec{v_2 '} |^2, although I am not sure of how helpful this will be.

Conservation of momentum:

m \vec{v_1} + \vec{0} = m \vec{v_1 '} + m \vec{v_2 '}

\vec{v_1} = \vec{v_1 '} + \vec{v_2 '}

Taking the magnitude, | \vec{v_1} | = | \vec{v_1 '} |+ | \vec{v_2 '} |; again, I am not certain of how helpful this will be.

______________________________________________________

Up to this point, I am not sure as to how to proceed. Could someone provide me with a hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bashyboy!

Bashyboy said:
Taking the magnitude, | \vec{v_1} | = | \vec{v_1 '} |+ | \vec{v_2 '} |; again, I am not certain of how helpful this will be.

Nooo. :redface:

##|\vec{v_1}|=| \vec{v_1 '} + \vec{v_2 '} | ≠ | \vec{v_1 '} |+ | \vec{v_2 '} |##. :wink:
 
Yes, of course. I actually have the correct expression on my paper, but somehow I failed to properly type it up.
 
Bashyboy said:
Yes, of course. I actually have the correct expression on my paper, but somehow I failed to properly type it up.

Well...##|\vec{v_1'}+\vec{v_2'}|## means the magnitude of resultant of ##\vec{v_1'}## and ##\vec{v_2'}##. Can you proceed further?
 
Well, I now have that | \vec{v_1} | = | \vec{v_r '} |, and I also have that |\vec{v_1}|^2 = | \vec{v_1 '} |^2 + | \vec{v_2 '}|^2. I am to make some sort of substitution?
 
Bashyboy said:
Well, I now have that | \vec{v_1} | = | \vec{v_r '} |, and I also have that |\vec{v_1}|^2 = | \vec{v_1 '} |^2 + | \vec{v_2 '}|^2. I am to make some sort of substitution?

If two vectors, ##\vec{A}## and ##\vec{B}## make an angle ##\theta## with each other, what is the magnitude of resultant of the two vectors?
 
I don't quite follow. I have never seen the sum of two vectors in terms of their angle.
 
Bashyboy said:
I don't quite follow. I have never seen the sum of two vectors in terms of their angle.

I don't know how it is at your place but that's something taught at the very beginning here.

Okay, if you haven't seen it, you can use cosine rule to derive it. Draw a vector diagram.
 
No, I would much rather see your method, please.
 
  • #10
Bashyboy said:
No, I would much rather see your method, please.

Apply cosine rule to the triangle shown in the attachment.
 

Attachments

  • vector.png
    vector.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 632
  • #11
When you say cosine rule, do you also mean the law of cosines? The law of cosines for vectors is simply the dot product, is it not?
 
  • #12
Bashyboy said:
When you say cosine rule, do you also mean the law of cosines? The law of cosines for vectors is simply the dot product, is it not?

Yes, very sorry, it is the law of cosines. I am used to calling it the "cosine rule". :redface:

To avoid confusion, I am talking about this: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LawofCosines.html
 
  • #13
So, you are suggesting that by solving the law of cosines for theta, it will equal 90 deg.?
 
  • #14
Bashyboy said:
So, you are suggesting that by solving the law of cosines for theta, it will equal 90 deg.?

You can see it yourself. Apply the law of cosines. Show your work.
 
  • #15
Sorry it took awhile to reply. Well, after applying the Law of Cosines, the problem became rather trivial: it's all a matter of memorizing those tricks and formulas of mathematics. At any rate, Pranav-Arora, I thank you very much for time.
 
  • #16
Bashyboy said:
Sorry it took awhile to reply. Well, after applying the Law of Cosines, the problem became rather trivial: it's all a matter of memorizing those tricks and formulas of mathematics. At any rate, Pranav-Arora, I thank you very much for time.

Glad to help. :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K