Conservation of energy of a block of ice

AI Thread Summary
A 2.5 kg block of ice at 0.0 °C and an initial speed of 5.7 m/s slides on a level floor, and the problem involves calculating how much ice melts when its kinetic energy is converted to internal energy. The kinetic energy (KE) of the block is calculated as 42 J. Given that 3.3 × 10^5 J is required to melt 1.0 kg of ice, the amount of ice that melts is determined to be 1.3 × 10^-4 kg. This indicates that only a small amount of ice melts due to the energy conversion. The calculations confirm that the initial kinetic energy is entirely converted to internal energy, resulting in minimal melting.
Lunar Guy
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Well... It is first first time on the Physics Forums, and I'm stuck on this problem:

1. A 2.5 kg block of ice at a temperature of 0.0 °C and an initial speed of 5.7 m/s slides across a level floor. if 3.3 × 10^5 J are required to melt 1.0 kg of ice, how much ice melts, assuming that the initial kinetic energy of the ice block is entirely converted to the ice's internal energy?



2. ∆PE + ∆KE +∆U = 0
(the change in potential energy + the change in kinetic energy + the change in internal energy = 0)
PE = mgh
KE = ½mv²




3. Well... I really have no idea how to solve this one...

But it sounds to me that KE = ½(2.5 kg)(5.7 m/s)² somewhere in there... But I really don't know what I am supposed to solve for (I think it is the mass of how much ice melts). I don't know how to integrate 3.3 × 10^5 J into an equation. If I could get a equation to start off from, I could do the rest. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure the problem doesn't give you a *final* velocity? The basic concept is that while the block is sliding across the floor, friction does negative work on it, reducing its kinetic energy. The kinetic energy lost heats up the block (i.e. it is converted into internal energy). If you knew the final speed, you'd know the change in kinetic energy. From that, you could calculate how much ice melts.
 
No final velocity is given... Is there a way I can find it from that information?

EDIT: 3.3 × 10^5 J is circled in my textbook for some reason...
 
Last edited:
Yeah, maybe we are meant to interpret "the initial kinetic energy is ENTIRELY converted..." as meaning all of it. In that case, the final kinetic energy would be zero.
 
All right, I'll attempt to work off of that. :)

Here we go:

PEi + KEi +Ui = PEf + KEf + Uf

PEi & PEf = 0

KEf = 0

KEi +Ui = Uf

KEi = Uf - Ui <--- (∆U)

½mv² = ∆U

½(2.5 kg)(5.7 m/s)² = ∆U

42 J = ∆U

3.3 × 10^5 J/1.0 kg = 42 J/m

m(3.3 × 10^5 J) = (42 J)(1.0 kg)

m = 42 J(kg)/3.3 × 10^5 J

m = 1.3 × 10^-4 kg


1.3 × 10^-4 kg of ice melts...

That's not much, isn't it? I hope this is correct...
 
Last edited:
Does it seem that I got the right answer?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top