How Fast Are Rockets Moving at Moon's Orbit?

AI Thread Summary
Two rockets are launched from Earth's surface at speeds of 17 km/s and 22 km/s, and the discussion focuses on determining their speeds when they reach the moon's orbit. The conservation of energy equation is applied, but initial attempts yield the same speeds as when launched, indicating a misunderstanding of the variables involved. It's clarified that the radius used in calculations should not be zero; instead, it should represent the Earth's radius for the initial position and the combined distance to the moon for the final position. The importance of consistent radius values in the equation is emphasized to avoid undefined expressions. The discussion concludes with a realization of the correct approach to calculating the speeds at the moon's orbit.
darklich21
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two rockets are launched from Earth's surface, one at 17 km/s and the other at 22 km/s. How fast is each moving when it crosses the moon's orbit?


Homework Equations


Kf + Uf= K0 + U0
0.5mvf^2 -GMm/R = 0.5mv0^2 - GMm/R


The Attempt at a Solution


So I attempted to use the equation above, using the Earth's mass and the Earth's radius, It didn't work, my speeds came out to be exactly 17 and 22 just like from the start. I'm going to say that the radius of the moon and the mass of the moon comes into play here. Can someone help, with perhaps a better equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radius in this case the distance from M, and is different on each side of the equation. So it's R_1 and R_2. You could use the center of the Earth or the surface of the Earth as the origin, as long as you are consistent. the surface is probably easier. So the radius at the start is 0. And the radius at the moon is the distance from the Earth to the moon. Ignore the actual moon. it's not important here.

You should be able to handle it from here.
 
how can the radius be 0, the radius in my equation is in the denominator. it would make 1 part of the expression undefined
 
nvm i figured it out, but I am going to correct your response. The radius is NOT 0, but instead the raidus of the earth, while on the other side of the equation, it's the radius of the Earth + the distance to the moon.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top