Conservation of energy using a spring

AI Thread Summary
A 785-gram metal block connected to a spring is pushed and released, sliding off a 1.6 m high table. The spring's potential energy converts to kinetic energy as the block moves, with the coefficient of kinetic friction affecting its distance traveled. Initial calculations suggested an implausible slide distance due to neglecting gravitational forces. The correct approach involves using conservation of energy principles, factoring in both spring energy and gravitational potential energy. Ultimately, the user resolved the confusion about friction force calculations and arrived at a valid solution.
rwinge
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 785-gram metal block is placed on a level table that is 1.6 m high. It is connected to a horizontal spring whose force constant is 3000 N/m. The block is pushed against the spring, compressing it by 0.100 m, and released. It slides along the table and goes off of the edge.

Coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.200 (Uk)

If the speed of the block just before it strikes the ground is 7.3 m/s, what distance did the block slide along the table?


Homework Equations



Work = delta K + delta U
U spring= (1/2)Kx^2
K block = (1/2)mv^2





The Attempt at a Solution



What I can come up with so far is that the potential energy of the spring (U) is equal to the kinetic energy done on the block (K). So in that case I set the two equations equal to each other

(1/2)Kx^2 = (Uk)mg(delta X) and so

15 J = 1.54(delta X)

so delta X = 9.74 m.


This doesn't seem very plausable to me with such a high spring coefficient and neglecting to use the height of the table and final velocity.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start backwards. Use conservation of energy between the instant it leaves the table to the instant it hits the ground to solve for its speed as it left the table. Then use your work energy equation between the start point and the point it left the table.
 
You're assuming that the block goes only on the table. You need to take into account its total energy when compressed and its total energy when hitting the ground.
 
Last edited:
Okay so I think I am heading in the right direction now.

IVe got

Work = (delta K) + ( delta Uspring) + (delta Ugravity)

delta K = (1/2)Mvf^2 - (1/2)Mvi^2 = 20.92 J
delta Uspring = (1/2)Kxf^2 - (1/2)Kxi^2 = -15 J
delta Ugravity = (1/2)mghf - (1/2)kxf^2 = -12.31 J

adding theses gives me W = -6.39

I can also say that Wother = (coefficient of kinetic friction)(force of kinetic friction)(delta X)

in this case how am I coming up with the force of kinetic friction? because isn't that (coefficient of kinetic friction)*(normal force)? This just seems redundant to me.

any ideas?
 
Nevermind! haha I ended up getting it. I was just thinking about the force of friction wrong. Somehow I neglected to include gravity in my first calculation which gave an extremely long distance. thanks for the input guys!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top