Conservation of Mechanical Energy-help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a skier who starts from rest at the top of a hill and loses contact with the snow at the crest of a second hill. Participants clarify that the skier loses contact precisely at the top of the second hill, which indicates that the forces acting on the skier must be considered at that point. The conversation highlights the importance of kinetic energy and centripetal force in understanding the skier's motion. The final understanding is that sufficient kinetic energy is required for the skier to maintain motion without contact at the hill's crest. This problem emphasizes the principles of conservation of mechanical energy and circular motion in physics.
moephysics
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A skier starts from rest at the top of a hill. The skier coasts down the hill and up a second hill, as the drawing illustrates. The crest of the second hill is circular, with a radius of . Neglect friction and air resistance. What must be the height h of the first hill so that the skier just loses contact with the snow at the crest of the second hill?


I don't get the last part of this question I mean does the skier lose contact at the crest of the second hill or right before it or right after it. I just need some clarification with that and I've attached the drawing that comes with the problem. Thats all and thank you
 

Attachments

  • ngr022.gif
    ngr022.gif
    4.1 KB · Views: 317
Physics news on Phys.org
moephysics said:
I don't get the last part of this question I mean does the skier lose contact at the crest of the second hill or right before it or right after it.
Assume that it means what it says: The skier loses contact at the crest of the hill (right at the top). What does that tell you about the forces on the skier at that point?
 
Doc Al said:
Assume that it means what it says: The skier loses contact at the crest of the hill (right at the top). What does that tell you about the forces on the skier at that point?

it tells me that he has gained enough kinetic energy so that he won't touch the crest at that point
 
moephysics said:
it tells me that he has gained enough kinetic energy so that he won't touch the crest at that point
OK, but how much is that? Hint: Consider the forces acting on the skier at that point.
 
Doc Al said:
OK, but how much is that? Hint: Consider the forces acting on the skier at that point.

well he's kind of undergoing circular motion so there must be a centripetal force acting on him if he were to go along the crest of the hill without losing contact with it.
 
Last edited:
umm yea yea i get itt,, thanksss a lot for you help :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top