Conservation of momentum in a system, direction changes?

AI Thread Summary
Momentum is conserved in a system, but the direction of a ball after colliding with a wall can change depending on the angle of impact. When a ball strikes a stationary wall at a 45-degree angle, it typically reflects in the same plane, but factors like friction and spin can alter its trajectory. If the wall is rotated, it can direct the ball to move in any desired direction post-collision. The wall will experience an equal and opposite momentum change corresponding to the ball's new direction. Thus, both the angle of collision and wall orientation significantly influence the ball's movement after impact.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18
We all know that momentum is conserved in a system. But I am confused of one thing.

Suppose we have a system containing a wall with very large mass and a ball and use a classical x-y coordinate axis.

If I swing the ball at an angle of 45 degrees from the horizontal, upwards to the huge wall (which is at rest),

is it possible for the ball to move in a different direction that isn't collinear to its current direction after collision?

Say, after coliding with the wall, can the ball move in the +x direction?

Or will it always be bound to move on the on the 45 degree horizontal line?

I suspect that if we change the angle of colision, i.e. we rotate the wall, then we can make the ball move in any direction we want.

Is this true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't fully understand your question. However the incident direction and the reflected direction are in the same plane.
 
x86 said:
Say, after coliding with the wall, can the ball move in the +x direction?
A real ball with friction and spin can do that.
No matter how exactly the ball will move afterwards, the wall takes the corresponding momentum change in the opposite direction (this can include a vertical component if you consider friction).

If you can rotate the wall, then you can get every direction even without friction, sure.
 
  • Like
Likes x86
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top