Conservation of Momentum in Inelastic Collisions

AI Thread Summary
In inelastic collisions, momentum is conserved, meaning the total momentum before the collision equals the total momentum after the collision. The equation m_1\vec{v}_1 + m_2\vec{v}_2 = (m_1 + m_2)\vec{v}_f illustrates this principle, where m represents mass and v represents velocity. The vector nature of momentum indicates that both magnitude and direction must be considered in the calculations. Participants in the discussion referenced external resources to clarify concepts related to inelastic collisions. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the behavior of colliding objects.
kevina
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain to me the vector nature of momentum in a case where two objects collide and stick together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
Yes! I remember seeing that link once before. I was looking for it but couldn't find it. Thanks Doc Al. :)
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

B K Energy & Momentum: Driving Force or Lost Heat?
Replies
12
Views
1K
How momentum is conserved in an inelastic collision
Replies
25
Views
4K
B Conservation of momentum in a closed system
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Why is KE not conserved when momentum is?
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
Why is momentum conserved in elastic and inelastic collisions?
Replies
3
Views
2K
An Alternative Approach to Solving Collision Problems
Replies
7
Views
5K
I How do we analyze collisions involving accelerating objects?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Elastic or inelastic collision?
Replies
8
Views
2K
B Conservation of momentum and conservation of energy details
Replies
30
Views
3K
B Conservation of Momentum for system of particles
2
Replies
52
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top