Conservation of momentum problem

AI Thread Summary
In a one-dimensional collision involving two objects with masses m and 3m, where the object with mass m is moving at three times the velocity of the object with mass 3m, the conservation of momentum equation is applied. The initial momentum is calculated as m(3v) + 3m(v) = 0, leading to the conclusion that the final velocities after the collision must also maintain a total momentum of zero. The discussion indicates that while the velocities after the collision do not need to be zero, they must satisfy the conditions of momentum conservation, likely implying an elastic collision where kinetic energy is conserved. Participants suggest substituting the variables for clarity and simplifying the equation to solve for the final velocities. The problem emphasizes the importance of understanding momentum conservation in collision scenarios.
bookerdewitt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object with mass m and an object with mass 3m collide in one dimension. The object with mass m is moving at 3 times the velocity of the object with mass 3m. What can you say about their velocities after the collision?

Homework Equations


m1vi1 + m2vi2 = m1vf1 + m2vf2



The Attempt at a Solution


Well first I tried to use the equation for conservation of momentum and solve for the final velocities but it got quite messy and I wasn't getting anywhere. But if they collide head on wouldn't the velocities after the collision have to be 0 since the total momentum before would be 0? The only thing is it doesn't say theyre colliding head on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It says that they collide in one dimension, which is a way of saying that they collide head-on. The velocities do not have to be zero after the collision, but the momentum has to remain zero. This is probably supposed to be an elastic collision, so kinetic energy must remain unchanged (i.e., velocity can not be zero).

To start, try changing m1 and m2 to m and 3m, and then vi1 and vi2 to 3v and v. After you do that, you can simplify the equation considerably.
 
I did try that but I must have messed up somewhere... ill try it again
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top