Conservation of Momentum Question Involving Two-Dimensions

AI Thread Summary
A grenade rolling west at 0.954 m/s explodes into three equal mass pieces, with two pieces moving at specified velocities and angles. The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of the third piece using conservation of momentum principles. Participants clarify that the mass of the grenade can be treated as a variable that cancels out, meaning it is unnecessary to assign specific values to the masses of the pieces. The calculations should focus on the velocities rather than the mass fractions. The key takeaway is that the equal mass assumption simplifies the problem, allowing for straightforward momentum calculations without needing to specify mass values.
omgbeandip
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A grenade is rolling due west at 0.954m/s along a floor when it explodes into three pieces of equal mass. The first piece moves at 3.6m/s, 20° [N of W]. The second travels at 5.8m/s, 62° [S of W]. Calculate the velocity of the third piece.

Homework Equations


P=mv
PBefore=Pafter
a^2 + b^2= c^2
Tan^-1 to find angle

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is in the attached image. I was curious if my masses were correct. Since they are all equal, I inputted 1 as my before component, and 1/3 for the 3 after components. Is this correct? And, are my calculations correct as well?[/B]
 

Attachments

  • Scan.jpeg
    Scan.jpeg
    25.8 KB · Views: 637
Physics news on Phys.org
Regarding the masses: You could simply assume that the grenade has a total mass ##m##, which will make the parts have mass ##m/3##. You will notice that ##m## cancels out of the final answer and thus that it does not matter what you chose for ##m##. In particular, ##m = 1\,\rm kg## should give the correct answer just as well as any other mass.
 
omgbeandip said:

Homework Statement


A grenade is rolling due west at 0.954m/s along a floor when it explodes into three pieces of equal mass. The first piece moves at 3.6m/s, 20° [N of W]. The second travels at 5.8m/s, 62° [S of W]. Calculate the velocity of the third piece.

Homework Equations


P=mv
PBefore=Pafter
a^2 + b^2= c^2
Tan^-1 to find angle

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is in the attached image. I was curious if my masses were correct. Since they are all equal, I inputted 1 as my before component, and 1/3 for the 3 after components. Is this correct? And, are my calculations correct as well?[/B]
I don't think you should put the mass as 1/3 since that would create the assumption that the original mass is 1kg. Just look at the velocities. When they tell you that the masses are equal, it implies that the mass is negligible, so do the exact same calculations you have done already and simply remove the (1/3).
 
WhosUrDaddy said:
When they tell you that the masses are equal, it implies that the mass is negligible, so do the exact same calculations you have done already and simply remove the (1/3).
There is no implication of the sort. "Negligible" mathematically means "very small" (i.e. can be considered zero) by comparison with something else. There is no such comparison here as the three fragments have the same mass.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top