Conservation of relativistic momentum for identical particles

theusername8
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If a particle of mass M is at rest in a lab when it decays into 3 identical particles of mass m with:
particle 1: having a velocity of 4c/5 in the -i direction vector
particle 2: having a velocity of 3c/5 in the -j direction vector
particle 3: having an unknown velocity in a direction defined by an unknown Θ

how would a find the direction and speed of particle #3 with respect to the lab, with respect to particle #2. And also the ration of M/m

I've tried computing the average direction and velocity of particles 1 and 2 then reversing the direction vector but i think I'm going about it the wrong way.

thanks in advance guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would you do this if it were not relativistic?
 
i was able to solve v for #3 to be .837c at 29.4 degrees
 
How did you do that?
 
used equation gamma(mu)=p . For particle #3 got a velocit of m<-4/3c,-3/4c>. arctan (3/4 / 4/3 )=29.36
now I am trying to use u_y'= u_y/(gamma(1-(u_xv/c^2))) to find the relative y velocity between them but ended up with 1.017c
 
For particle #3 got a velocit of m<-4/3c,-3/4c>
... what is the magnitude of this velocity?
What direction should the velocity be pointing in for momentum to be conserved?
(You should also specify the reference frame.)

Sounds like you are just plugging numbers into equations.
What was your reasoning?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top