Conservation of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz Vector

fisica1988
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hmm...Latex doesn't seem to be working at the moment...

How does one show the conservation of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz (LRL) vector using the Hamiltonian of the two-body system? Showing it's conserved otherwise it's not hard. You can take the time derivative of the LRL vector and show that it's zero or a couple other ways which I worked out before (I would type it out but Latex seemingly disabled makes it tedious and cumbersome). The one thing I can't figure out is how to get the conservation of the LRL vector from the Hamiltonian of the two-body system. What I did was take the square of the LRL vector and find the energy from that but then it becomes uncertain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know how to calculate commutators?
 
Ah yes yes, thank you, I got it now.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top