Conservative and non-conservative forces-problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sabreen Khan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around problems involving conservative and non-conservative forces, specifically focusing on the behavior of springs and blocks under gravitational influence. Participants explore concepts related to potential and kinetic energy, conservation of energy, and the mechanics of spring systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy to problems involving springs and falling blocks. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of total mechanical energy, the conditions under which energy is considered conserved, and the implications of potential and kinetic energy in these scenarios.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of various interpretations of energy conservation and its application to specific problems. Some participants express confusion about the initial conditions and the role of different forms of energy, while others attempt to clarify these concepts through examples and analogies.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problems and the differing methods taught by instructors, leading to confusion about the correct approach. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and assumptions related to conservative forces and mechanical energy.

Sabreen Khan
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1. A spring with a force constant k hangs vertically. A block of mass m is attached to the un-stretched spring and allowed to fall from rest. Find an expression for the maximum distance the block falls before it begins moving upward.

2. Now..from what i knw
F=-kx (k=spring constant, x= extension)
and i think it should be done like this:
F=-kx
mg=-kx
x=-mg/k
but i guess i did it wrong because my teacher did it in another very complicated way which i cannot understand. PLease see if you can help me.

Solution: let da maximum distance be y.

Total Mechanical evergy= total kinetic + total potential energy
0 = (1/2)mv^2 - mgy + (1/2)ky^2

and from here y was evaluated giving a result of
y= 2mg/k

My question is ..what is the total potential energy and y? What is the value of V, is it 0 , if yes, then y? and why is the total mechanical energy 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know this?

For maximum extension>>>>

mv^2=kx^2
 
Kinetic and potential energy

hello everyone..
please help me solve this problem if you can

Q. Two blocks are attached to a light string that passes over a mass-less, frictionless
pulley. The two blocks have masses m1= 3 kg and m2 = 5 kg and are initially at rest.
Find the speed of either block when the heavier one falls a distance h = 4 m.

solution:

total kinetic energy: 0.5m1v^2 + 0.5m2v^2

Total potential energy: m1gh-m2gh

Total energy=0 = K.E + P.E
from this equation, speed,v is calculated

confusion:
why is the total energy 0?
m2 loses P.E and that is why it is -ve
m1 gains P.E, so it is +ve ..i understand that...bt what about the kinetic energy? they both gain K.E is that y they are positive?

please help me.
 
no i dint know that...thanx...but what happens after that? which method shall i follow ?
 
hey phys guru..thanx..its worked..x= 2mg/k ...bt is it like a formula that
For maximum extension>>>>

mv^2=kx^2

isnt there a way to derive that formula?
 
hey...cant we derive it like this :
work done = 0.5mv^2
work done by a stretched spring :0.5kx^2

so..if they are equal...

mv^2 = kx^2
right ?
 
what i don't understand about the 1st problem is what my teacher did with the potential and kinetic energy...I completely don't get it...can u help me with that please ?
 
Sabreen Khan said:
1. A spring with a force constant k hangs vertically. A block of mass m is attached to the un-stretched spring and allowed to fall from rest. Find an expression for the maximum distance the block falls before it begins moving upward.

2. Now..from what i knw
F=-kx (k=spring constant, x= extension)
and i think it should be done like this:
F=-kx
mg=-kx
x=-mg/k
but i guess i did it wrong because my teacher did it in another very complicated way which i cannot understand. PLease see if you can help me.

You solved a different problem: How far does a block stretch a spring when gently hung from it. But in the assigned problem, the block is dropped from its initial position. To solve this, use conservation of energy.

Solution: let da maximum distance be y.

Total Mechanical evergy= total kinetic + total potential energy
0 = (1/2)mv^2 - mgy + (1/2)ky^2

and from here y was evaluated giving a result of
y= 2mg/k

My question is ..what is the total potential energy and y? What is the value of V, is it 0 , if yes, then y? and why is the total mechanical energy 0?
The total mechanical energy is conserved. Total mechanical energy is the sum of KE, gravitational PE, and spring PE. Y is the distance that the block moves down.

Your teacher chose to measure gravitational PE using the initial position as a reference. At the initial position, all three terms of the mechanical energy equal zero (it's not moving, the spring is unstretched, and the gravitational PE is zero), so the total is zero. As the block lowers, gravitational PE lowers while spring PE rises.

There are two values for y which make the total mechanical energy = 0. The initial position (y = 0) is one; solve for the other.
 
physixguru said:
Do you know this?

For maximum extension>>>>

mv^2=kx^2
This is not helpful or relevant to this problem.
 
  • #10
I still don't get why mechanical energy should be zero? i get that initially it was zero...bt after the block moves down, why shall it be zero ?
 
  • #11
btw...i understood all da other things very well...thanx..
 
  • #12
intial total mechanical energy should equal to final total mechanical energy...is that y the fine is 0?
 
  • #13
how do i knw when evergy is conserved. A force is conservative if the total work it does on a particle is 0 when the particle moves around any closed path returning to its initial position. examples are gravity and electromagnetic. But how am i supposed to know when this work done is 0? like in the case of the hanging masses m1 n m2 stated earlier, the particles do not return to their initial position, how can i say that energy is conserved.

I think i understood the term wrong. What does it actually mean-"energy is conserved"? Initial energy equal final enery,and hence the change is 0 ?

please help me out..im in a great dilemna
 
  • #14
Sabreen Khan said:
I still don't get why mechanical energy should be zero? i get that initially it was zero...bt after the block moves down, why shall it be zero ?
Since there are no dissipative (non-conservative) forces, mechanical energy is conserved.

Sabreen Khan said:
intial total mechanical energy should equal to final total mechanical energy...is that y the fine is 0?
Right.

Sabreen Khan said:
how do i knw when evergy is conserved. A force is conservative if the total work it does on a particle is 0 when the particle moves around any closed path returning to its initial position. examples are gravity and electromagnetic. But how am i supposed to know when this work done is 0? like in the case of the hanging masses m1 n m2 stated earlier, the particles do not return to their initial position, how can i say that energy is conserved.
That's just a general statement about conservative forces. If you move an object around, then return it to its origin, the work done by gravity is zero: gravity is conservative. Same thing for the spring; spring forces are conservative.

I think i understood the term wrong. What does it actually mean-"energy is conserved"? Initial energy equal final enery,and hence the change is 0 ?
Exactly.
 
  • #15
Thanks a lot Doc Al! it really helped me...i have a few more confusion and problems..please stay around to help me out.
 
  • #16
Doc Al said:
This is not helpful or relevant to this problem.

It seems DocAl has some personal rivalry with me or what...

For me the expression is completely relevant to the problem.In fact i have solved all my high end physics problems with the same expression and got full marks.

I apologize if i am too rude or offensive but the fact remains that the expression i just provided has been in Indian textbooks since ages for the same category of problems.
 
  • #17
physixguru said:
It seems DocAl has some personal rivalry with me or what...
Say what?

For me the expression is completely relevant to the problem.In fact i have solved all my high end physics problems with the same expression and got full marks.
Good for you. Please show how that expression is relevant to this problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K