Consevation of energy in collisions

  • Thread starter Thread starter rugapark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions Energy
AI Thread Summary
Momentum is conserved in all types of collisions, while kinetic energy is conserved only in elastic collisions. Total energy is always conserved, regardless of the type of collision. Inelastic collisions convert some kinetic energy into other forms of energy, such as heat or sound, which is why kinetic energy is not conserved in those cases. Understanding the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions is crucial for answering the question effectively.
rugapark
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I am going through some questions for resits in August, and I have no idea what this question is wanting me to explain :

"Briefly discuss the circumstances under which (i) momentum, (ii) kinetic energy and (iii) total energy are conserved in collisions between two bodies. [3]"

it's only a 3 marker, so I'm sure it's not wanting an essay, but I just don't even know where to start... HELP!

Cheers guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rugapark said:
I am going through some questions for resits in August, and I have no idea what this question is wanting me to explain :

"Briefly discuss the circumstances under which (i) momentum, (ii) kinetic energy and (iii) total energy are conserved in collisions between two bodies. [3]"

it's only a 3 marker, so I'm sure it's not wanting an essay, but I just don't even know where to start... HELP!

Cheers guys

Thread moved to Homework Help. Here's a hint, rugapark. Check out the terms elastic collision and inelastic collision, and see if that info helps. You can read about them at wikipedia.org, or in your textbook and course materials. Does that get you going again?
 
rugapark said:
I am going through some questions for resits in August, and I have no idea what this question is wanting me to explain :

"Briefly discuss the circumstances under which (i) momentum, (ii) kinetic energy and (iii) total energy are conserved in collisions between two bodies. [3]"

it's only a 3 marker, so I'm sure it's not wanting an essay, but I just don't even know where to start... HELP!

Cheers guys

Don't take my word, I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but wouldn't the only case where all three are conserved is in an environment where there is no friction?
 
so would i be right in saying,

"If the collision between the two bodies is an elastic collision, all momentum, kinetic energy and total energy will be conserved as elastic collisions do not convert any original energy forms into another."

I am struggling to understand this, but I really am determined to get it soon.. so please excuse me if any of my comments seem a little... "crappy" :)

thanks!
 
rugapark said:
so would i be right in saying,

"If the collision between the two bodies is an elastic collision, all momentum, kinetic energy and total energy will be conserved as elastic collisions do not convert any original energy forms into another."

I am struggling to understand this, but I really am determined to get it soon.. so please excuse me if any of my comments seem a little... "crappy" :)

thanks!

Yes, that would be right.
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'

Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'

The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Confused about a conservation of energy problem
Replies
4
Views
2K
Impulse and perfectly inelastic collision between 2 points
Replies
4
Views
796
Potential Energy - 2D inelastic collision - ballistic pendulum
Replies
10
Views
2K
Ambiguous question on momentum and how it works...
Replies
13
Views
1K
Collision between a block and a curved up-ramp surface
Replies
11
Views
3K
Work done during a collision -- Change in Kinetic Energy & change in Momentum
Replies
1
Views
2K
Determining non-conserved work from a collision
Replies
3
Views
805
Speed of charged balls after collision
Replies
13
Views
1K
Elastic Collision and Momentum of Ice Skaters
Replies
16
Views
3K
Kinetic energy and momentum in an elastic collision
Replies
22
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top