Consider the motion of a point mass m in the potential V(r)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the motion of a point mass in a potential defined as V(r) = -k/r, where k is a positive constant. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that circular motion with a constant frequency ω exists and determining the relationship between ω and the radius of this motion. There is a need to show the conservation of energy and angular momentum along the motion curve and confirm that the radius of circular motion corresponds to the minimum of the effective potential. Questions arise regarding the approach to solving the problem, particularly concerning the arc length integral and its relevance to the overall solution. Clarifications are sought on the dimensions of the integrand and its connection to the potential's parameters.
Muskovite
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the motion of a point mass m in the potential
V(r)=-k/r , k>0

Show that there is a solution x(t) of the equations of motion which is a circular motion
with constant circular frequency ω. Determine the relation between ω and the radius of the
circular motion. Show explicitely that energy and angular momentum are conserved along
the motion curve, by computing their values. Show also that the radius of the circular
motion coincides with the radius where the corresponding eective potential takes its
minimum.

Homework Equations


γ(t)=(rcos(ωt); r sin(wt)); r > 0; ω> 0;

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not really sure where to start. Maybe one can find the arc length for a piece of the curve γ, using this
s(t0,t1)=∫ from t0 to t1√(∑γ'k^2dx) and then go into the details, but for the moment I can't conjure up anything.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to know what approach you are expected to use. Can you give us a little information about the concepts that you are currently studying that you feel are relevant to the question?

I don't understand your integral for the arc length. Can you explain how you arrived at the expression for the integrand and why you feel that an expression for arc length will help to solve the problem? Is the k in the integrand the same k that appears in the potential? Does your integrand have the right dimensions to represent length?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top