Can a Motorbike Stop in Time to Avoid a Crash?

AI Thread Summary
A motorbike traveling at 25 m/s can stop 2.5 meters in front of a broken-down car located 65 meters ahead, given a constant deceleration of 5 m/s². The calculations show that it takes the biker 62.5 meters to come to a complete stop. If the biker delays braking by one second, he would be traveling at 25 m/s for that duration, reducing the distance to the car to 40 meters. Using the equations of motion, the biker would then hit the car at a speed of 15 m/s. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clear calculations and visual aids for solving physics problems effectively.
FaraDazed
Messages
347
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A motorbike is riding along a straight road at 25m/s when the rider suddenly notices that there is a broken down car in his way, 65 meters ahead. He immediately brakes giving the bike a constant deceleration of 5m/s^2.

A. How far in front of the car does the biker come to a stop?
B. If the biker had not reacted a soon as he did and applied the brakes 1 second later, what speed would the bike had hit the car?

Homework Equations



v=u+at
v^2=u^2+2as
s=1/2(u+v)t
s=ut+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



The question confuses me a little as the question gives a distance of 65m in the question but asks you to also find a distance. But anyways, my attempts are below...

Part A:

v=0 a=-5 u=25

v^2=u^2+2as
0=625+(2x-5xs)
0=625+(-10xs)
s=(625-0)/-10

s=2.5mPart B:

v=0 t=1 a=-5 s=65

s=1/2(u+v)t
65=1/2(25+v)1
v=65/12.5

v=5.2m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I can tell you that you got Part a correct as far as my calculations, and here's why:
At 65m the cyclist applies the brakes and starts to decelerate at 5m/s^2. The problem then asks you how far before the car he stops, so his final velocity is 0. You obviously got that and your calculations brought you to 62.5m, so in turn 2.5 m in front of the car. It took him 62.5m to go from 25m/s to 0m/s, and since the car was at 65m, he didn't quite reach it. so 2.5m in front of the car. I hope that helps.

For part two:
Initially, before the brakes the cyclist is moving at 25m/s. At 65m he starts to apply the brake, but for this part, he doesn't. He waits a second, so he is still traveling 25m/s for another second, past that 65m mark.
 
fornax said:
Well I can tell you that you got Part a correct as far as my calculations, and here's why:
At 65m the cyclist applies the brakes and starts to decelerate at 5m/s^2. The problem then asks you how far before the car he stops, so his final velocity is 0. You obviously got that and your calculations brought you to 62.5m, so in turn 2.5 m in front of the car. It took him 62.5m to go from 25m/s to 0m/s, and since the car was at 65m, he didn't quite reach it. so 2.5m in front of the car. I hope that helps.

For part two:
Initially, before the brakes the cyclist is moving at 25m/s. At 65m he starts to apply the brake, but for this part, he doesn't. He waits a second, so he is still traveling 25m/s for another second, past that 65m mark.

Thanks for the reply :)

Right I think I get the second part now, so if he waits one second, the distance between the bike and the car would now be 40m?

So part B would be..

v=25 s=40 a=-5 u=?

v^2=u^2+2as
625=u^2+(2x-5x40)
625=u^2+400
u^2=625-400
u^2=225
u=√225

u=15m/s ?
 
Looks good, that's exactly what I got for my answer as well. I'm not sure how you go about doing your problems, but I would highly suggest drawing a simple diagram of the problem at hand. Later on it is a good practice, and it keeps things orderly and harder to mix up. Even a line with some numbers on it might help clarify some things that may have been unclear before. Good luck with your future problems :)
 
Edit: sorry realized my mistake.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top