# Constant velocity and turning around

• fogvajarash
Forget the dock, forget the banks, forget the land entirely. For all intents and purposes you are moving on a motionless surface that is the body of water (in your mind, transform the river to a motionless lake). Now reinterpret the problem from the moment that the lunch box is dropped.The boat left the dock at a speed of V and turned around at a speed of S. How long after turning around did the boat catch up to the lunch box?The boat left the dock at a speed of V and turned around at a speed of S. How long after turning around did the boat catch up to the lunch box?In summary

## Homework Statement

A vacationer gets into his out-board motorboat and leaves a dock on a river bank for a day of fishing. Just as he turns upstream, he hears a splash but pays no attention and continues cruising at normal speed. 30.0 minutes later he realizes that his watertight lunchbox is missing. He then turns downstream, with the motor still set at cruising speed. He sights his lunchbox floating down the river and retrieves it at a point 0.2 km downstream of the dock. How long after turning around does he pick up his lunch?

v = s/t

## The Attempt at a Solution

I can't figure out anything in the problem. I don't know how to set it up.

Draw vectors.

"Constant velocity and turning around"

Just a tip, you can't have constant velocity and turn around. With velocity, direction matters. What you mean is speed.

johnqwertyful said:
"Constant velocity and turning around"

Just a tip, you can't have constant velocity and turn around. With velocity, direction matters. What you mean is speed.
Okay

phinds said:
Draw vectors.
Draw the vectors for the velocity? The only one remaining then would be the one that is down the stream by 0.2km. How can i proceed from that?

Thank you very much

When I said "draw the vectors" what I meant was DRAW THE VECTORS! Show us your work so we can see exactly where you are stuck.

An important question to ask oneself when presented with this sort of question is, what are the given velocities measured with respect to? In this case, how is one to define the "cruising speed" of the boat? Does the answer to that question make things easier or harder?

gneill said:
An important question to ask oneself when presented with this sort of question is, what are the given velocities measured with respect to? In this case, how is one to define the "cruising speed" of the boat? Does the answer to that question make things easier or harder?
Isn't the "cruising speed" of the boat sort of the boat sailing at constant velocity (in the points in which the boat isn't changing direction)? I'm really lost in this problem.

fogvajarash said:
I'm really lost in this problem.

Draw the vectors

fogvajarash said:
Isn't the "cruising speed" of the boat sort of the boat sailing at constant velocity (in the points in which the boat isn't changing direction)? I'm really lost in this problem.

"Cruising speed" is generally taken to mean a set speed that the boat runs at for long periods of time, particularly when no maneuvering is required. Typically it would correspond to a particular setting of the throttle on the motor.

The question to ask yourself is, what is this velocity measured with respect to?

gneill said:
"Cruising speed" is generally taken to mean a set speed that the boat runs at for long periods of time, particularly when no maneuvering is required. Typically it would correspond to a particular setting of the throttle on the motor.

The question to ask yourself is, what is this velocity measured with respect to?
Isn't this velocity measured with respect to where the boat departs from (say the dock?)

phinds said:
Draw the vectors
I've got the vectors in here

#### Attachments

• asjdañlsdjñl.png
995 bytes · Views: 453
fogvajarash said:
Isn't this velocity measured with respect to where the boat departs from (say the dock?)

Nope. The setting of the throttle on the motor has no connection to the dock. The boat has no idea if its running up-stream, down-stream, or any direction related to the shore. The only thing the boat is mechanically "connected" to is the water itself...

gneill said:
Nope. The setting of the throttle on the motor has no connection to the dock. The boat has no idea if its running up-stream, down-stream, or any direction related to the shore. The only thing the boat is mechanically "connected" to is the water itself...
Okay. How can I proceed from knowing that fact?

fogvajarash said:
Okay. How can I proceed from knowing that fact?

Well, that's the sneaky bit that gives away the solution to these types of problems

If the boat's speed is always relative to the water it travels through, then for events that occur only on the water you can take the water itself as the frame of reference (where you base your coordinate system).

Forget the dock, forget the banks, forget the land entirely. For all intents and purposes you are moving on a motionless surface that is the body of water (in your mind, transform the river to a motionless lake). Now reinterpret the problem from the moment that the lunch box is dropped.

1 person
gneill said:
Well, that's the sneaky bit that gives away the solution to these types of problems

If the boat's speed is always relative to the water it travels through, then for events that occur only on the water you can take the water itself as the frame of reference (where you base your coordinate system).

Forget the dock, forget the banks, forget the land entirely. For all intents and purposes you are moving on a motionless surface that is the body of water (in your mind, transform the river to a motionless lake). Now reinterpret the problem from the moment that the lunch box is dropped.
Thank you so much gneill! I finally got the answer which is 30.0min.

fogvajarash said:
Thank you so much gneill! I finally got the answer which is 30.0min.

I told you it was sneaky.