Constants and multiverse possibilities

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter leonstavros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Multiverse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the implications of physical constants in the universe and the possibility of multiverses. Participants explore whether the fine-tuning of these constants suggests an intelligent universe or if it can be explained through a multiverse scenario. The conversation touches on philosophical and metaphysical questions regarding the nature of existence and intelligence in the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the fine-tuning of constants suggests either an intelligent universe or a multiverse where our universe is just one of many with varying constants.
  • Others argue that the existence of intelligent entities on a universal scale is highly complex and may not be feasible due to constraints like the speed of light.
  • A participant questions whether quantum entanglement could allow for instantaneous processing of information across universes, suggesting a form of universal evolution.
  • Some express skepticism about the plausibility of a "slot machine" analogy for constants, questioning who or what could create such a mechanism.
  • There is a contention regarding the interpretation of constants and their implications for the existence of intelligent life, with some asserting that speculation about constants is not convincing without prior knowledge of their values.
  • One participant suggests that if multiverses exist, it may be possible for some combinations of constants to yield intelligent universes, though this remains speculative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of constants, the nature of intelligence in the universe, and the validity of the multiverse hypothesis.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved assumptions about the nature of constants, the feasibility of universal evolution, and the implications of quantum entanglement on information processing.

  • #61
Agent M27 said:
To my understanding any particle which has no mass requires no medium to propagate, but will propagate through a medium dependent upon its refractive index.
Not quite. The refractive index is a purely electromagnetic phenomenon, resulting from how charged particles respond to the incoming electromagnetic wave. So, for example, massive particles can move faster through a medium with some refractive index than light. For charged particles, this causes Cherenkov Radiation.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #62
Thanks for clearing me up. I was just directed to that experiment by frame dragger and I omitted it accidently. Oops. It's a very interesting experiment by the way.

Joe
 
  • #63
Spacetime has properties called permeability and permissivity. That is what imposes the speed limit on photons. This is a good thing. It prevents everything from happening all at once in the universe. If you are looking for deeper meaning in physics, that is a good place to start.
 
  • #64
Chronos said:
Spacetime has properties called permeability and permissivity. That is what imposes the speed limit on photons. This is a good thing. It prevents everything from happening all at once in the universe. If you are looking for deeper meaning in physics, that is a good place to start.
Well, it's not those two quantities themselves, but rather the relationship between them that sets the speed. And it's just a dimensional consideration: the speed of light is what relates the strength of the electric force to the strength of the magnetic force.
 
  • #65
Chronos said:
Spacetime has properties called permeability and permissivity. That is what imposes the speed limit on photons. This is a good thing. It prevents everything from happening all at once in the universe. If you are looking for deeper meaning in physics, that is a good place to start.

One of the problems of an intelligent universe is communication. The universe has to communicate with itself at a faster rate then the speed of light. I proposed in a previous post that quantum entanglement might do the job. What I gather from peoples post is that quantum entanglement can not be used to communicate, further all events can not be perceived to happen at the same time. If some sort of intelligence exists and is aware of cosmic events then there must be a way that events be dimensionaly stamped (four dimensions) and perceived at a faster speed then the speed of light. Since we haven't discovered a speed that's faster than the speed of light I conclude that there isn't an intelligent entity in control.
 
  • #66
leonstavros said:
One of the problems of an intelligent universe is communication. The universe has to communicate with itself at a faster rate then the speed of light. I proposed in a previous post that quantum entanglement might do the job. What I gather from peoples post is that quantum entanglement can not be used to communicate, further all events can not be perceived to happen at the same time. If some sort of intelligence exists and is aware of cosmic events then there must be a way that events be dimensionaly stamped (four dimensions) and perceived at a faster speed then the speed of light. Since we haven't discovered a speed that's faster than the speed of light I conclude that there isn't an intelligent entity in control.
I think that's a very reasonable analysis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K