Constraints the elements of the 3D-rotation matrix must satisfy

ELB27
Messages
117
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Taken from "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by David J. Griffiths p.12 problem 1.8 (b):
What constraints must the elements R_{ij} of the three-dimensional rotation matrix satisfy, in order to preserve the length of vector A (for all vectors A)?


Homework Equations


The 3D rotation matrix around an arbitrary axis:
<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \bar{A_x}\\<br /> \bar{A_y}\\<br /> \bar{A_z}\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> R_{xx} &amp; R_{xy} &amp; R_{xz}\\<br /> R_{yx} &amp; R_{yy} &amp; R_{yz}\\<br /> R_{zx} &amp; R_{zy} &amp; R_{zz}\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}<br /> A_x\\<br /> A_y\\<br /> A_z\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />
Thus,
\bar{A_i} = \sum_{j=1}^3 R_{ij}A_j
where the index 1 stands for x, 2 for y and 3 for z.

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the length of the vector before and after transformation must be equal:
\sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})^2 = \sum_{i=1}^3 (A_i)^2
\sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})^2 = \sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})(\bar{A_i}) = \sum_{i=1}^3 \left( \sum_{j=1}^3 R_{ij}A_j \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^3 R_{ik}A_k \right) = \sum_{i=1}^3 (A_i)^2
The one before the last equality I obtain from substituting the above equation for \bar{A_i} .
I'm not sure how to proceed from here. I guess that I lack understanding of the summation notation. I tried looking it up but I still can't understand how to continue.

Any help will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ELB27 said:

Homework Statement


Taken from "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by David J. Griffiths p.12 problem 1.8 (b):
What constraints must the elements R_{ij} of the three-dimensional rotation matrix satisfy, in order to preserve the length of vector A (for all vectors A)?


Homework Equations


The 3D rotation matrix around an arbitrary axis:
<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \bar{A_x}\\<br /> \bar{A_y}\\<br /> \bar{A_z}\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> R_{xx} &amp; R_{xy} &amp; R_{xz}\\<br /> R_{yx} &amp; R_{yy} &amp; R_{yz}\\<br /> R_{zx} &amp; R_{zy} &amp; R_{zz}\\<br /> \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}<br /> A_x\\<br /> A_y\\<br /> A_z\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />
Thus,
\bar{A_i} = \sum_{j=1}^3 R_{ij}A_j
where the index 1 stands for x, 2 for y and 3 for z.

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the length of the vector before and after transformation must be equal:
\sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})^2 = \sum_{i=1}^3 (A_i)^2
\sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})^2 = \sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})(\bar{A_i}) = \sum_{i=1}^3 \left( \sum_{j=1}^3 R_{ij}A_j \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^3 R_{ik}A_k \right) = \sum_{i=1}^3 (A_i)^2
The one before the last equality I obtain from substituting the above equation for \bar{A_i} .
I'm not sure how to proceed from here. I guess that I lack understanding of the summation notation. I tried looking it up but I still can't understand how to continue.

Any help will be greatly appreciated!

Google "orthogonal matrix"
 
ELB27 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the length of the vector before and after transformation must be equal:
\sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})^2 = \sum_{i=1}^3 (A_i)^2
\sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})^2 = \sum_{i=1}^3 (\bar{A_i})(\bar{A_i}) = \sum_{i=1}^3 \left( \sum_{j=1}^3 R_{ij}A_j \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^3 R_{ik}A_k \right) = \sum_{i=1}^3 (A_i)^2
The one before the last equality I obtain from substituting the above equation for \bar{A_i} .
I'm not sure how to proceed from here. I guess that I lack understanding of the summation notation. I tried looking it up but I still can't understand how to continue.
First thing you should do is learn Einstein's summation convention (Einstein's greatest contribution to physics): repeated indices imply summation. It'll save you a lot of tedious writing. Using this convention, you have
$$\bar{A}_i \bar{A}_i = (R_{ij}A_j)(R_{ik}A_k).$$ No annoying sigmas to keep writing.

The relationship has to hold for all vectors, so try using ##A = (1, 0, 0)##, for example, to show that the first column of ##R## has to be a unit vector. For other choices of ##A##, you can show that different columns are orthogonal to each other.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Google "orthogonal matrix"

Thanks, I didn't know about these matrices!

vela said:
First thing you should do is learn Einstein's summation convention (Einstein's greatest contribution to physics): repeated indices imply summation. It'll save you a lot of tedious writing. Using this convention, you have
$$\bar{A}_i \bar{A}_i = (R_{ij}A_j)(R_{ik}A_k).$$ No annoying sigmas to keep writing.

The relationship has to hold for all vectors, so try using ##A = (1, 0, 0)##, for example, to show that the first column of ##R## has to be a unit vector. For other choices of ##A##, you can show that different columns are orthogonal to each other.

Thank you! So if I understand correctly, I just pick 2 convenient vectors like ##\vec{A} = <1,0,0>## and ##\vec{B} = <1,1,0>## and generalize the results I get for all choices? Am I allowed to do it without proving these relations in general?

EDIT: After some more readings I think I finally get it. Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top