Continuity equation, partial derivative and differential operators

pisgirl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
I have the following slide, and whilst I understand that the original point is "the rate of density, ρ, in each volume element is equal to the mass flux"...i am totally lost on the mathematics! (And I am meant to be teaching this tomorrow). I do not have any information on what the indivudual symbols refer to, I guess A is area and t is time etc. Can anyone understand this:

-∇(ρv)=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(ρd\tau) where d\tau=Adx
-∇.v = \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (Adx)
-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} Adx = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(Adx)
-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}=\frac{1}{A} \frac{\partial A}{\partial T}

Unfortunately I am not sure how to even get from line 1 to 2

and how t combine partial with full!

Argh! Thank you in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, pisgirl! :smile:

pisgirl said:
Hi all!
I have the following slide, and whilst I understand that the original point is "the rate of density, ρ, in each volume element is equal to the mass flux"...i am totally lost on the mathematics! (And I am meant to be teaching this tomorrow). I do not have any information on what the indivudual symbols refer to, I guess A is area and t is time etc. Can anyone understand this:

-∇(ρv)=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(ρd\tau) where d\tau=Adx
-∇.v = \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (Adx)
-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} Adx = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(Adx)
-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}=\frac{1}{A} \frac{\partial A}{\partial T}

Unfortunately I am not sure how to even get from line 1 to 2

and how t combine partial with full!

Argh! Thank you in advance!

I also have difficulty to make sense of these formulas.

I think you can only get from line 1 to line 2 if ρ is independent from both time and location.
Then ρ can be moved outside the differentiation and get canceled.
But I presume ρ is not supposed to be constant?
Would it be dependent on time?

Can you indicate which quantities are supposed to be vectors and which scalar?
And which quantities depend on place and/or time?

Line 2 contains ∇.v making it ambiguous what v represents.
What does it represent?
Volume? Velocity? Specific volume?
Note the difference between ∇v and ∇.v.
The first is a gradient which requires a scalar function and yields a vector.
The second is the divergence which requires a vector function and yields a scalar.

In line 3 we see that it was either
##∇v = (\frac{dv}{dx}, \frac{dv}{dy}, \frac{dv}{dz})##, but where did the other components go then? And where did Adx come from?
##∇ \cdot \mathbf v=\frac{dv_x}{dx} + \frac{dv_y}{dy} + \frac{dv_z}{dz}##.
If we assume ##v_y = v_z = 0##, we're still left with an Adx that comes out of nowhere.

In line 4 suddenly a T pops up.
Temperature?
Or a typo that should have been ##\tau##?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top