I Continuity of Quotient of Complex Values

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the continuity of the function f(a) = √((a - 1i)/(a + 1i)) as a approaches zero. It highlights that the discontinuity arises from the square root function's branch cut, which causes a sign flip in the imaginary part when a small value is introduced. The principal branch of the square root function is conventionally defined, leading to discontinuities at the negative real axis. The behavior of f(a) differs for values approaching zero from the left and right, revealing that the function is not continuous at that point. Adjusting the branch of the square root can resolve the discontinuity, ensuring continuity in the function's behavior.
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hey all,
I have a very simple question regarding the quotient of complex values. Consider the function:
$$f(a) = \sqrt{\frac{a-1i}{a+1i}}$$
where ##i## is the imaginary unit. When I evaluate f(0) in Mathematica, I get ##f(0) = 1i##, as expected. But if I evaluate at a very small value of ##a## such as ##a = 10^{-20}##, I get ##f(10^{-20}) = 10^{-20} - 1i##. I naively thought that ##f## would be continuous in ##a## but it is clear that somehow the imaginary part of ##f## flips sign the moment I introduce some small value for ##a##. How do I explain this behavior? I feel like there is something obvious here I am missing.
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem is not in the quotient, it is in the square root function. The square root of any real number, ##r \in \mathbb{R}, r \gt 0## can be positive or negative. It is a matter of convention that the positive number is considered the "principle branch" and is the answer given. That means that the "principle branch" excludes the negative answers, which are in another (non-principle) branch. The negative real axis in the z domain is called a "branch cut". When your input crosses the branch cut there will be a discontinuity because the continuous answer would cross into a different branch answer. That is what happened in your example. (see this )
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK, thatboi and andrewkirk
The problem arises from the use of the square root sign as if it denoted a function - ie a map that can only give one value per input. Recall that every complex number has square roots, Each is -1 times the other. So to make the square root sign able to work as a function we need to adopt a convention as to which of the two roots we select, For square roots of positive real numbers we use the convention That we always select the positive root. For square roots of negative numbers that can't apply so we need a different convention. that typically means it selects the root that lies within a designated set of two consecutive quadrants of the complex plane. That makes such a sqrt function discontinuous at the places in the domain that map to the boundary of that region of the range.

It looks like Mathematica is using the 1st and 4th quadrants, ie requiring the argument to lie in the range ##(-\pi/2, \pi/2]##. That makes its square root function discontinuous at the negative x axis, as that maps to the negative y axis that is the omitted boundary of the selected half plane.

For your case with small ##a##, the item inside the sqrt sign approaches -1 as a goes to zero, so the discontinuous sqrt function gives a discontinuity there.

It's easily fixed by selecting the other square root: ##10^{-20}+i##, which is very close to ##i##.

EDIT: Just when I posted it, I saw that @FactChecker posted essentially the same thing just before me (only more concisely)!

EDIT2: If you instead adopt a square root function that always selects the square root lying in quadrant 1 or 2 (more specifically: the root's argument lying in ##(0,\pi]##) , your function will be continuous, because that sqrt function's discontinuity lies on the positive x axis, which is not in the image of the expression inside the square root sign.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes thatboi and FactChecker
Isn't there an issue too, of how calculators rounding of, accuracy breaking down at such small numbers?
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
WWGD said:
Isn't there an issue too, of how calculators rounding of, accuracy breaking down at such small numbers?
Good point. Those types of small problems near the discontinuity of a branch cut would cause large discontinuities.
 
thatboi said:
Hey all,
I have a very simple question regarding the quotient of complex values. Consider the function:
$$f(a) = \sqrt{\frac{a-1i}{a+1i}}$$
For real a, in the principal branch this is <br /> f(a) = \sqrt{\frac{(a-i)^2}{1 + a^2}} = \begin{cases}<br /> \frac{-a + i}{\sqrt{1 + a^2}} &amp; a \leq 0 \\<br /> \frac{a - i}{\sqrt{1 + a^2}} &amp; a &gt; 0. \end{cases} You can see that <br /> \lim_{a \to 0^{-}} f(a) = f(0) = i \neq -i = \lim_{a \to 0^{+}} f(a).
WWGD said:
Isn't there an issue too, of how calculators rounding of, accuracy breaking down at such small numbers?
In general, yes. But here from the exact result above you can see that the only inaccuracy in the numerical result of 10^{-20} - i comes from taking \sqrt{1 + 10^{-40}} \approx \sqrt{1 + 2^{-132.88}} to be exactly 1. In particular, the sign of the imaginary part is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top