Continuity & Uniform Continuity: Question on Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter student12s
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the continuity of a function f and the derived function g, defined as g(x) = inf_{x<t in D} f(t), where f is increasing on a dense set. It highlights that while the continuity of f does not guarantee the continuity of g, uniform continuity of f does ensure uniform continuity of g. The original poster is studying this topic independently, seeking to understand its implications for distribution functions in probability. There is a note that such questions are typically better suited for homework help forums, though the thread remains open for discussion. The focus remains on the mathematical properties and implications of continuity in this context.
student12s
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I´ve been trying to solve this for some time: Let f: R to R be an increasing on a dense set. Define g(x)=inf_{x<t in D} f(t). Show that continuity of f does not imply continuity of g but uniform continuity of f does imply uniform continuity of g.
Any help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
student12s said:
I´ve been trying to solve this for some time: Let f: R to R be an increasing on a dense set. Define g(x)=inf_{x<t in D} f(t). Show that continuity of f does not imply continuity of g but uniform continuity of f does imply uniform continuity of g.
Any help?

Is this homework/coursework? If not, what is the application?
 
I encounter this question while studying Probability by my own. It's not homework/coursework. The application is understanding properties of distribution functions.
 
student12s said:
I encounter this question while studying Probability by my own. It's not homework/coursework. The application is understanding properties of distribution functions.

In general, even self-study questions should go into the Homework Help forums. Please keep that in mind. I'll leave this thread here for now, however.
 
I apologize. It was a misunderstanding. I will post in the correct part of the forum. Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top