Continuous and discrete spectra

Click For Summary
Converting a continuous, aperiodic spectrum to a discrete spectrum can be achieved without energy loss if the frequency samples are spaced appropriately, specifically less than 1/(2T) apart, allowing for lossless reconstruction. This process involves sampling the spectrum by multiplying it with a Dirac Comb function, leading to a convolution of the original signal and the Fourier Transform of the comb function. The discussion emphasizes that this method aligns with Shannon's theorem, but applied in the frequency domain rather than the time domain. Additionally, there is interest in understanding how to implement a practical Nyquist low-pass filter in this context. Overall, the conversion maintains signal integrity under the right conditions.
Domenico94
Messages
130
Reaction score
6
Is there any way to convert a continuous, aperiodic spectrum, to a discrete spectrum, in a signal? If so, would part of he energy of this signal be lost, I am this process of conversion, or would it be " distributed" amomg the various frequencies?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not sure I fully understand your question. Sampling the spectrum is equivalent to multiplying it with a Dirac Comb function and then the signal you get from transforming back to the time domain would be a convolution of the original signal and the FT of the comb function. If the original signal is only present for a limited time 0 - T , this would allow lossless reconstruction when the frequency samples are less than 1/(2T) apart
 
BvU said:
Not sure I fully understand your question. Sampling the spectrum is equivalent to multiplying it with a Dirac Comb function and then the signal you get from transforming back to the time domain would be a convolution of the original signal and the FT of the comb function. If the original signal is only present for a limited time 0 - T , this would allow lossless reconstruction when the frequency samples are less than 1/(2T) apart
Yes. Thanks..It s exactly what I was asking for. No losses than? Of any kind?
 
No losses. It is the equivalent of Shannon's theorem but now from the frequncy domain to the time domain instead of the other way around.
 
BvU said:
Not sure I fully understand your question. Sampling the spectrum is equivalent to multiplying it with a Dirac Comb function and then the signal you get from transforming back to the time domain would be a convolution of the original signal and the FT of the comb function. If the original signal is only present for a limited time 0 - T , this would allow lossless reconstruction when the frequency samples are less than 1/(2T) apart
This is the equivalent of the Nyquist criterion for temporal sampling. I'm trying to get my head around how to specify the equivalent to a practical Nyquist LP filter in this process.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K