Continuous Extension of Function at Origin: Can f=1?

AI Thread Summary
The function f: ℝ² → ℝ defined as (x,y) |--> (x²+y²-(x³y³))/(x²+y²) can be made continuous at the origin by defining f(0,0) = 1. Evaluating the function along the lines x=y and y=x confirms that the limit approaches 1 as (x,y) approaches (0,0). Transitioning to polar coordinates simplifies the function to 1 - r⁴sin³θcos³θ, which also approaches 1 as r approaches 0. This confirms that the function can indeed be extended continuously at the origin. Thus, defining f(0,0) = 1 is a valid solution for continuity.
Alexx1
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
How can the function

f: ℝ² → ℝ : (x,y) |--> {{x^2+y^2-(x^3y^3)}\over{x^2+y^2}} if (x,y) ≠ (0,0)

be defined in the origin so that we get a continuous function?When I take 'x=y' (so (y,y)) and 'y=x' (so (x,x)) I get:

{{2-y^4}\over{2}}

and

{{2-x^4}\over{2}}

So for the first one I get '1' when y=0
and for the second one I get '1' when x=0

So can I say that if (x,y)=0 --> f=1 ??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can extend your function to a continuous one if you define f(0,0)=1.
 
Petr Mugver said:
Yes, you can extend your function to a continuous one if you define f(0,0)=1.

Thx!
 
In order to make this general, you should switch to polar coordinates.

Then, we can transforme the fraction to:
\frac{r^{2}-r^{6}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{3}\theta}{r^{2}}=1-r^{4}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{3}\theta, r\neq{0}
clearly, this is readily extendable for r=0.
 
arildno said:
In order to make this general, you should switch to polar coordinates.

Then, we can transforme the fraction to:
\frac{r^{2}-r^{6}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{3}\theta}{r^{2}}=1-r^{4}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{3}\theta, r\neq{0}
clearly, this is readily extendable for r=0.

Thank you very much!
And how about this one?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=421612
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top