Continuous Extension of Function at Origin: Can f=1?

AI Thread Summary
The function f: ℝ² → ℝ defined as (x,y) |--> (x²+y²-(x³y³))/(x²+y²) can be made continuous at the origin by defining f(0,0) = 1. Evaluating the function along the lines x=y and y=x confirms that the limit approaches 1 as (x,y) approaches (0,0). Transitioning to polar coordinates simplifies the function to 1 - r⁴sin³θcos³θ, which also approaches 1 as r approaches 0. This confirms that the function can indeed be extended continuously at the origin. Thus, defining f(0,0) = 1 is a valid solution for continuity.
Alexx1
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
How can the function

f: ℝ² → ℝ : (x,y) |--> {{x^2+y^2-(x^3y^3)}\over{x^2+y^2}} if (x,y) ≠ (0,0)

be defined in the origin so that we get a continuous function?When I take 'x=y' (so (y,y)) and 'y=x' (so (x,x)) I get:

{{2-y^4}\over{2}}

and

{{2-x^4}\over{2}}

So for the first one I get '1' when y=0
and for the second one I get '1' when x=0

So can I say that if (x,y)=0 --> f=1 ??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can extend your function to a continuous one if you define f(0,0)=1.
 
Petr Mugver said:
Yes, you can extend your function to a continuous one if you define f(0,0)=1.

Thx!
 
In order to make this general, you should switch to polar coordinates.

Then, we can transforme the fraction to:
\frac{r^{2}-r^{6}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{3}\theta}{r^{2}}=1-r^{4}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{3}\theta, r\neq{0}
clearly, this is readily extendable for r=0.
 
arildno said:
In order to make this general, you should switch to polar coordinates.

Then, we can transforme the fraction to:
\frac{r^{2}-r^{6}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{3}\theta}{r^{2}}=1-r^{4}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{3}\theta, r\neq{0}
clearly, this is readily extendable for r=0.

Thank you very much!
And how about this one?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=421612
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top