Continuous Function Outgrowing Polynomial but Not Exponential

  • Thread starter Thread starter disregardthat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Growth
disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
Does there exist a continuous function which outgrows polynomial growth, but not exponential growth?

I.e. does a there exist a continuous function f such that \frac{x^n}{f(x)} \to 0 and \frac{f(x)}{a^x} \to 0 for all positive real n and a?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes. Look at it this way: you take logs of the polynomial and the exponential, you get g_1(x) = C_1 \ln x and g_2(x) = C_2 x. Can you find a function that grows faster than g_1 and slower than g_2 for all C? Clearly you can, because ln grows extremely slowly.
 
Thanks,

x^{\sqrt{x}} is such a function.
 
Or e^{\sqrt{x}}, or e^{x/\ln{x}}.
 
I'm sure we can find many as you pointed out.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top