Contractors for LHC: Learn About CERN Turnarounds

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    lhc
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the recent shutdown of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the upgrades being implemented. The user, an instrument designer with diverse industry experience, is curious about CERN's approach to managing turnarounds and the contractors involved in the LHC's construction. They draw parallels with the oil and gas sector, where major companies typically outsource engineering and construction contracts. The user is interested in exploring potential career opportunities at CERN, particularly in instrumentation. Overall, the conversation highlights the user's desire to understand CERN's operational structure and potential contractor relationships.
fonz
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
I have just been reading about the latest LHC shutdown and the upgrades and tests being carried out.

I currently work in the oil & gas industry as an instrument designer having previously worked in petrochemical, pharmaceuticals, ammunitions manufacturing, food and beverage plus more. I like to switch industries every so often just to try and cover the full spectrum of engineering. Actually what is interesting is that despite the production and process differences the instrumentation generally doesn't tend to vary a great deal or at least the measurement principles don't of course.

I would be interested to know how CERN operate in terms of managing and implementing their turnarounds. I've been trying to find out myself which companies were contracted to build the LHC and who the principle engineering and design contractors were for the project (I assume it wasn't CERN engineers alone). In the Oil and Gas industry generally the big oil companies offer E&C (engineering & construction) contracts to companies such as Petrofac, Amec, Wood Group PSN etc. which is how I made my debut in the industry. Does anybody know if CERN operate in a similar way?

If so I might make some enquiries because in terms of career development in instrumentation this would be a massive opportunity.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd suggest starting here.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top