Control direction of laser beam

AI Thread Summary
To control the direction of a laser beam without mechanical parts, two main alternatives are suggested: using electro-optic crystals, like Lithium Niobate, to change the refractive index and employing acousto-optic modulators to diffract the beam based on input frequency. While galvos are recommended for their speed and effectiveness in large-angle adjustments, they involve mechanical components. Electro-optic and acousto-optic methods can be more complex and costly to integrate but offer faster modulation. Resources for obtaining materials and electronic diagrams for setup are sought after, indicating a need for practical guidance in implementing these technologies. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the exploration of non-mechanical solutions for laser beam direction control.
topher3638
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I am currently trying to figure out how I can control the direction of a laser beam. Galvos are widely used in order to electronically change the direction of the beam. Although, I was hoping to find a way to do this without mechanical parts.

There are two ways I have looked at for alternative ways to change the direction of the beam without a galvo:

1) Use some kind of electro-optic crystal material to dynamically change the refractive index of the material, which will bend the beam at different angles. For example, I hear this might be done by applying a voltage or electric field to a Lithium Niobate crystal.

2) Use something like a acousto-optic modulator, to diffract the beam at different angles based upon some input frequency.


So here's the question(s):

-Has anyone ever done this kind of thing before?
-Whats the best way to electronically bend a laser beam without mechanical parts?
-Where do you get supplies to make this, like the LiNiO3 crystals?
-Are there any electronic diagrams for connecting this up?

I feel like there is a lot of information about these effects, but not the right information to actually set it up.

Anything is appreciated!

Thanks,
Chris M
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Either method will work. You might want to check out http://www.photonics.com/" .

Hope this helps you find the components you'll need.

Regards
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chris:

Assuming that you wish to dynamically alter the beam path, use a galvo - it's probably the best thing to use, especially if you want to move the beam by a large angle. They also have a fast response. EOM and AOM devices will work, but they are (usually) more expensive (especially the drivers) and a bit more complex to integrate into your optics, although the modulation can be driven faster. Personally I'd always rather use galvos if I could help it, but that might be my foible. If you just want a static method of doing it, use ordinary mirrors.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...

Similar threads

Back
Top