Conventional Current: Tom's Questions Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
AI Thread Summary
Conventional current is often equated with electric current in discussions about electrical circuits. Electric current refers to the flow of charge through a conductor, with its direction conventionally defined from positive to negative, which is opposite to the actual flow of electrons. In most contexts, when "electric current" is mentioned, it implies conventional current unless specified otherwise. This was confirmed in an example where the direction of the magnetic field above a current-carrying cable was determined using the right-hand rule, indicating that the electric current referred to was indeed conventional. Additionally, in circuit diagrams, unless otherwise noted, the depicted direction of current is assumed to be conventional current. While the choice of convention (conventional vs. real current) is flexible in circuit design, understanding the polarity of components is crucial to ensure proper functionality, particularly for polarized components like capacitors and transistors.
ThomasR
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Just a couple of questions on conventional current that have been troubling me...

Firstly, does conventional current = electric current? I saw a question on a past exam that had "electric" current in a cable flowing from north to south, and asked to determine the direction of the magnetic field directly above the cable. The answer was west - so thus electric current == conventional current?

Secondly, if it is not stated on diagrams which show the direction of current, should it be assumed that it is depicting conventional current?

Thanks in advance

Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll try my best to these questions.
Electric current means the rate of flow of charge(in coulomb) passing through a given cross-section of a conductor. Conventionally, Its direction is taken to be positive to negative, opposite to the REAL direction of current but it is equal in magnitude to it. In most of the questions the word 'electric current' refers to conventional current, unless stated otherwise. In the question you asked, by applying right hand rule, the answer 'west' is only possible if the electric currect refers to conventional current. Thus, it confirms that here Electric currect does mean conventional current.
Lastly, Yes, if the question does not state otherwise, the direction of the flow of electic current shown in the diagram is the direction of conventional current.
Hope this helps. :smile:
Ab. S.
 
Last edited:
Up to you

In electronic circuit diagrams it does not matter which convention you use so long as you are aware of the polarity requirements of the components , that is you cannot connect polarised capacitors or transistors just any way you want. Conventional or real is just a mental state -- electrons flow from -ve to +ve and holes flow from +ve to -ve irrespective of how you visualize this
but you better connect the collector of an npn transistor to the +ve supply
and it's emitter to the -ve , otherwise it may still work but at 1/100th of it's capability.
Ray.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top