Convergent Series Can Be Bounded by Any ##\epsilon>0##

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Assume that ##a_k > 0## and ##\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_n## converges. Then for every ##\epsilon > 0##, there exists a ##n \in Bbb{N}## such that ##\sum_{k=n+1}^\infty a_k < \epsilon##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the series converges, the sequence of partial sums must be cauchy. Hence, given ##\epsilon > 0##, there exists an ##N \in \Bbb{N}## such that ##|\sum_{k=1}^m a_n - \sum_{k=1}^n | < \epsilon## for every ##n,m \ge N##. Letting ##n \ge N## and ##m = n + p##, where ##p \in \Bbb{N}## is arbitrary, we get ##|\sum_{k=1}^{p} a_{n+k} | < \epsilon## or ##\sum_{k=1}^{p} a_{n+k} < \epsilon## since the sequence is positive. Since this holds for every ##p##, the partial sums are bounded and therefore the series converges to a number less than ##\epsilon##; i.e.,

$$\sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty} a_k < \epsilon$$

How does that sound?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Every element in the sequence is smaller than ϵ" is not sufficient to show that the limit is smaller than ϵ.
You don't need the Cauchy criterion, you can directly compare the partial sum to the limit. Alternatively, think about 2ϵ or ϵ/2 somewhere.
 
  • Like
Likes Bashyboy
You are right. I should have begun with ##\frac{\epsilon}{2}##, and then my last line would have read "##\sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty} a_k \le \frac{\epsilon}{2} < \epsilon##."
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top