Conversion from Polar to Cartesian equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Helena54321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Polar
AI Thread Summary
Converting polar equations to Cartesian coordinates can be challenging for students, particularly in 2D contexts. Key formulas for conversion include x = r cos(θ) and y = r sin(θ), with r² = x² + y² providing a foundational relationship. Specific examples, such as r = 2a sin(θ), can be manipulated to derive the equation of a circle. Understanding the geometric implications of these conversions is crucial, as visualizing the graphs aids in grasping the concepts. Mastery comes from practice and deriving the equations rather than rote memorization.
Helena54321
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I just did a quiz in a lecture and walked out crying. There was one question (which probably seems very easy to most :/ ) were you had to convert polar equations to cartesian ones. We also had to draw the cartesian graphs (2D).

a) rcos(th)
b)r=2asin(th)
c)r^2sin2(th)=2k
d)rsin(th+(pi/4))=a2^(1/2)

th=theta.

In our lecture notes for this course we have derivations for conversion from cylindrical-cartesian (3D) and spherical-cylindrical. (-=either way)

But when it comes to 2D cartesian and polar I'm like ?. I have no clue what to do. I know a) is a straight line where x=a and b) is a circle but only because my friend told me. I understand a) but none of the rest.

I feel quite lost. How do I approach polar and cartesian egtn conversions?? Thank you!

Helena. First year undergrad at The Chinese uni of Hong Kong x x x nd feeling quite lost! :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, polar coordinates can be converted to Cartesian using these equations:

x=r\cos\theta

y=r\sin\theta

r^2=x^2+y^2

So, for the part b) you have

r=2a\sin\theta

r^2=2ay

x^2+y^2-2ay=0

x^2+(y^2-2ay+a^2)=a^2

x^2+(y-a)^2=a^2

Now, the last equation is implicit equation of a circle with center in (0,a) and radius a.

Try to do similar manipulations with other parts of the question and see what you can get.
 
Instead of just memorizing the formula conversions (though it is so common in physics that you'll eventually know them by heart), the most important thing is to know how to derive them.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_...rting_between_polar_and_Cartesian_coordinates and take a look specially in the graph in the right side of the page. This is what you have to do in order to reach the formula and this is precisely what they asked you to do in your test. It's very important to understand the graph, which isn't more complicated than applying Pytharogas' theorem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top