Convert AC Waveform from Polar to Rectangular with Phaser

  • Thread starter Thread starter dE_logics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian
AI Thread Summary
Converting an AC waveform from polar to rectangular form involves representing the waveform as v(t) = x + jy, where x and y correspond to the cosine and sine of the phase angle, respectively. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the inclusion of complex numbers in this conversion, as the original waveform appears to consist solely of real values. It clarifies that the phase angle is derived from the arctangent of the imaginary over real components. The participants question the accuracy of the representation and whether the complex component (jx) is necessary, suggesting that it might not impact the real value of v(t). Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding complex numbers in AC waveform analysis.
dE_logics
Messages
742
Reaction score
0
When converting an AC waveform (from polar) to a rectangular form, a source quotes v(t) as x + jy.

But how is this possible?...I mean v(t) is clearly the x-axis length of r (vm).

Further more how does complex number come into the picture?...every thing is real.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is my source wrong?
 
Are you not getting the question?
 
dE_logics said:
When converting an AC waveform (from polar) to a rectangular form, a source quotes v(t) as x + jy.

But how is this possible?...I mean v(t) is clearly the x-axis length of r (vm).

Further more how does complex number come into the picture?...every thing is real.

in a polar form, you'll have the magnitude and a phase where a phase is nothing but actan(imaginary/real).

thus in rectangular form indeed, you you'll have v(t) = x +jy wheer x = cos(phase) and y = sin(phase).

Ok?
 
Ok so one of the axes will return a wrong value...right?

So how come v(t) = y + jx?; I mean it should be v(t) = y...the jx doesn't make a difference?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top