MHB Convert another equation x^2+y^2=4 to polar form

Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
x^2+y^2=4

I have so far:

(r^2)cos^(theta)+(r^2)sin(theta)=4

Idk what I'm supposed to do from here
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to also square the trig. functions:

$$x^2+y^2=4$$

$$(r\cos(\theta))^2+(r\sin(\theta))^2=4$$

$$r^2\cos^2(\theta)+r^2\sin^2(\theta)=4$$

Factor the LHS...what do you have...is there a trig. identity you can apply?
 
MarkFL said:
You need to also square the trig. functions:

$$x^2+y^2=4$$

$$(r\cos(\theta))^2+(r\sin(\theta))^2=4$$

$$r^2\cos^2(\theta)+r^2\sin^2(\theta)=4$$

Factor the LHS...what do you have...is there a trig. identity you can apply?

got it! thanks!
 
Elissa89 said:
got it! thanks!

We see we have a circle centered at the origin, and in polar coordinates, that's simply a constant value for \(r\). The Cartesian equation:

$$x^2+y^2=a^2$$ where \(0<a\)

Has the polar equation:

$$r=a$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top