Convert g*cm^2 to kg*m^2: Explanation & Help

AI Thread Summary
To convert a moment of inertia from g*cm^2 to kg*m^2, first recognize that the conversion involves both mass and length squared. The conversion factors are 0.001 kg/g and 0.01 m/cm, which must be squared for the area unit, resulting in a factor of 0.000001 (or 10^-6) when applied to g*cm^2. Therefore, the correct approach is to multiply the initial value by 0.000001 to obtain the equivalent in kg*m^2. This method ensures that units cancel appropriately, allowing for accurate conversion. Understanding these squared conversion factors is crucial for successful unit transformations in physics problems.
azure.hubris
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I need to convert a moment of intertia value given in g*cm^2 to kg*m^2, and was hoping someone could give me a run down of the method behind these kind of conversions. Do I simply assume that since g to kg is a factor 0.001 and cm to m is 0.01, that I can apply a factor of 0.00001 to my initial value? I feel that that method would be fine for say, g*cm to kg*cm, but I'm not sure how to account for the squared dimension. Any help/explanation would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general when converting units set your quantity to be converted and your conversion factor up as a multiplication of fractions. For example from m/s to cm/s
10 \frac m s * 100 \frac {cm} {m} = 10*100 \frac m s * \frac {cm} {m} = 1000 \frac {cm} s
Note that in this example the m in the numerator cancels the m in the denominator, leaving only cm in the numerator.
 
Last edited:
okay, i see what you mean, I've used that technique before, but the confusion came from two places for me.
1) that I'm dealing with a squared quantity, so would the conversion be 1000cm^2/m^2?
2) that the it's g*cm^2, rather than g/cm^2, leaving me wondering how to actually set up the calculation.

i'm sure it's quite obvious how to do this, but the way i set it up, the units don't cancel out. i need to be certain of this conversion before i can begin to do the problem, since it's for an online assignment for which i have only one attempt. could you possibly lay out how you'd set it up for the case of my calculation? i know it's not usually acceptable to 'give' the solution away in this forum, but the physics of the problem are not a concern, just this one calculation. okay, thanks again for your help.
 
The method is the same just square the conversion factors. So

10m^2 = 10 m^2 * (100 \frac {cm} m)^2 = 10 * 10^4 m^2 \frac {cm^2} {m^2} = 10^5 cm^2
 
thanks for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top