Converting 25 Degrees to Radians: A Puzzling Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter zillea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degrees Radians
AI Thread Summary
To convert 25 degrees to radians, multiply by π/180, which simplifies the conversion process. The correct formula ensures that degrees cancel out, leaving the answer in radians. A common mistake is swapping the numerator and denominator in the conversion factor. The relationship between degrees and radians is established by the fact that 360 degrees equals 2π radians. Using a slide rule can also facilitate this conversion by directly aligning degrees with radians.
zillea
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
this should be a simple question, but I am just not getting the right answer. I need to change 25 degrees to radians. I know, that 360 degrees = 2pi radians, but I am not getting the right answer.
thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
multiply 25 degrees by \frac {\pi}{180}.

Just look at the units to remember how to do this. (number in radians and degrees are technically unitless, but use radians and degrees as the units)
 
Just to expand ...

You were on the right track. The only possible way I can see you getting the wrong answer is if you got your denominator and numerator swapped.

If you want to convert from degrees to radians, you want to get rid of the degrees. That means the degrees has to be in the denominator so it cancels out.

If you want to convert from degrees to radians, you want to get rid of the radians. That means the radians has to be in the denominator.

Since \frac{2\pi}{360} = \frac{\pi}{180}

and \frac{360}{2\pi} = \frac{180}{\pi}

Most people just multiply degrees by \frac{\pi}{180}
or radians by \frac{180}{\pi}

If you happen to have a good slide rule, it's even easier. Set the cursor over the number of degrees on the D scale, and move the slide until the r mark on the C scale is under the hairline. Look below the C index and you have your number of radians. (This is basically the same as dividing the number of degrees by 57.2957795, which happens to equal 180/pi).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top