Converting Complex Numbers to Polar Form: A Mathematical Explanation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting complex numbers to polar form, particularly for those without calculators that can perform this function. The method involves calculating the modulus (R) using the formula √(x²+y²) and expressing the complex number in the form R(cosθ + jsinθ). An example is provided, demonstrating that for the complex number 3.76 + 4.78j, the conversion yields 6.08(cos(51.8) + jsin(51.8)). The conversation also emphasizes understanding the trigonometric relationships between the real and imaginary components. Overall, the mathematical explanation clarifies the conversion process for users facing similar challenges.
Paddy
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Firstly I do apologise, because this question is got more to do with the mathematical side of Electronic Engineering, because my mathematical classification is not that good I don't know where I would put this question on the mathematics section, if any of the moderators or whoever can, wants to move it there, I do apologise.

I am having a bit of problem with my calculator, unlike many other people in my class, my calculator can't exchange complex numbers to polar form, so I have to do it by using some mathematics.

I know how to change from polar form back to complex notation, so for example imagine a voltage of 6.08 |51.8*.

I believe that 6.08cos51.8 will get you the real component and 6.08sin51.8 is J, so in J-notation ==> 6.08 |51.8* = 3.76 + J4.78

I haven't made up these difficult numbers, but I have taken them from a class example, I suppose the method is correct because that was the answer checked by the teacher.


However I do not know how to exchange a number back to polar form, I think my best option would be buying a better calculator, but I would appreciate if someone could show me by mathematical terms, Thank You.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Let's consider a general case first, and consider the complex number x+yj, where x and y are real numbers. Now, we want to express this in polar form, which is R(cost+jsint). Here, R is the modulus of the complex number (I'm not sure whether you're familiar with this) but it is simply defined as √(x2+y2).

So, to move onto your example, we want to write 3.76+4.78j in the form R(cost+jsint). First calculate the modulus of the complex number; R=√(3.762+4.782)=6.08. Now, we factor this out of the complex number, to give 6.08(0.6181+0.7026j). This is nearly in polar form. The final step is to take cos-1(0.6181) and sin-1(0.7026). You will find that these are both 51.8, and so we have the number expressed as 6.08(cos(51.8)+jsin(51.8)), which has real part 6.08cos(51.8) and imaginary part 6.08sin(51.8), as you state in your post.

Hope this helps!
 
Last edited:
No worries, I googled polar to rectangular conversion complex numbers, and got lots of good hits. Here's the first one:

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_2/5.html

Basically just think of the trigonometry involved, with an x-y graph where the +x axis is the Real axis, and the +y axis is the Imaginary axis. We use the prefex j (or i in non-EE areas) to denote the Imaginary component in the rectangular form of complex numbers, or as a prefex to the angle (in radians) in complex exponential form (which is another notation for the polar form).

If you have any other questions about this topic after reading the tutorial, please feel free to repost in this thread.
 
Dang, cristo beats me to the punch again!
 
Thank you So, So much.

I was along the right lines, but the relationship between the imaginary and real numbers confused me a bit.

Starting to make sense and I am starting to get the idea. Thank you.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top