Converting Distance- Time Graph to Velocity- Time

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 10K views
clamchowder
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
You've got to bear in mind that your object starts from rest, then begins to travel with a constant acceleration, that is, its equation of motion is dictated by:
(1):[tex]x=\frac{at^2}{2}[/tex]
Therefore:
You can find, a-the acceleration by pasting in what is known(x being D, and t well, is just plain old "t").
Daniel
 
I didn't think of it that way, but I'll try it out now.

Thanks!
 
danielakkerma said:
Hi,
You've got to bear in mind that your object starts from rest, then begins to travel with a constant acceleration, that is, its equation of motion is dictated by:
(1):[tex]x=\frac{at^2}{2}[/tex]
Therefore:
You can find, a-the acceleration by pasting in what is known(x being D, and t well, is just plain old "t").
Daniel

I'm still confused on why my slope on my v vs t graph isn't anywhere near 9.80 though.

Distance of Fall (m) .10 .50 1.00 1.70 2.00
Time of Fall (s) .14 .32 . 46 .59 .63
Velocity (D/T) (m/s) .714 1.56 2.17 2.88 3.17
 
Well, look here:
If the equation is given by [tex]x=\frac{at^2}{2}[/tex], then clearly,
(1):[tex]a=\frac{2x}{t^2}[/tex]
(2) That causes the velocity to become [tex]v=at[/tex]
You're wrong to assume that the slope is simply (D/t). The relationship provided by this equation(1) is parabolic not linear, and you can see that on the first graph they provided you with.
Try computing 'a' with (1). all answers may vary up to ~0.2 and usually center around 10, that's the preferred rounding of 'g' in general.
Daniel
 
Oh, I'm sorry.
I never considered the fact it wasn't linear, which was stupid...
At first I was confused where the equations came from, but now I realized it was from
v= v_0 +at
y=.5at^2+v_0t

I finally got the right slope!

Thank you :)