Converting Distance- Time Graph to Velocity- Time

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting a distance-time graph to a velocity-time graph, specifically in the context of a physics problem related to motion under constant acceleration. The original poster is attempting to analyze the relationship between distance, time, and velocity, particularly in relation to gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of calculating velocity by dividing distance by time and question the linearity of the relationship. There is an exploration of the equations of motion and how they relate to the graphing of velocity versus time.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the equations of motion and the implications of constant acceleration. The original poster has acknowledged confusion regarding the slope of the velocity-time graph and has expressed a willingness to reconsider their approach based on the feedback received.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the initial conditions of the problem, specifically that the object starts from rest and the nature of the motion being parabolic rather than linear. The original poster's calculations and assumptions about the slope of the graph are under scrutiny, and there is a mention of acceptable variations in the calculated acceleration due to gravity.

clamchowder
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
You've got to bear in mind that your object starts from rest, then begins to travel with a constant acceleration, that is, its equation of motion is dictated by:
(1):[tex]x=\frac{at^2}{2}[/tex]
Therefore:
You can find, a-the acceleration by pasting in what is known(x being D, and t well, is just plain old "t").
Daniel
 
I didn't think of it that way, but I'll try it out now.

Thanks!
 
danielakkerma said:
Hi,
You've got to bear in mind that your object starts from rest, then begins to travel with a constant acceleration, that is, its equation of motion is dictated by:
(1):[tex]x=\frac{at^2}{2}[/tex]
Therefore:
You can find, a-the acceleration by pasting in what is known(x being D, and t well, is just plain old "t").
Daniel

I'm still confused on why my slope on my v vs t graph isn't anywhere near 9.80 though.

Distance of Fall (m) .10 .50 1.00 1.70 2.00
Time of Fall (s) .14 .32 . 46 .59 .63
Velocity (D/T) (m/s) .714 1.56 2.17 2.88 3.17
 
Well, look here:
If the equation is given by [tex]x=\frac{at^2}{2}[/tex], then clearly,
(1):[tex]a=\frac{2x}{t^2}[/tex]
(2) That causes the velocity to become [tex]v=at[/tex]
You're wrong to assume that the slope is simply (D/t). The relationship provided by this equation(1) is parabolic not linear, and you can see that on the first graph they provided you with.
Try computing 'a' with (1). all answers may vary up to ~0.2 and usually center around 10, that's the preferred rounding of 'g' in general.
Daniel
 
Oh, I'm sorry.
I never considered the fact it wasn't linear, which was stupid...
At first I was confused where the equations came from, but now I realized it was from
v= v_0 +at
y=.5at^2+v_0t

I finally got the right slope!

Thank you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
927
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K