I Converting galactical coordinates to horizontal/geographical coordinates

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tegalad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates
AI Thread Summary
To convert galactic coordinates to geographical coordinates for comparing the Orion Belt with the pyramids of Giza, it's essential to first understand the relationship between equatorial coordinates and geographic coordinates. Declination in equatorial coordinates corresponds to latitude, while right ascension can be converted to longitude by recognizing that 1 hour of right ascension equals 15 degrees of longitude. The primary difference lies in the reference points used for longitude, with geographic coordinates using Greenwich and celestial coordinates using the vernal equinox. For accurate positioning, the projection of Orion's Belt onto Earth must be adjusted to align with the pyramids' location. This process will help ensure that the graph accurately reflects the intended comparison.
Tegalad
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am doing an astrophysics project about Orion belt constelation and the pyramids of Giza. I am interested in the myth that the three pyramids is an exact copy of Orion belt. How should I convert galactical latitude/longtitude to linear/geographical coordinates so I could compare the constellation graph to pictures of the pyramids. I just used galactical longtitude/latitude to draw a graph in Origin and then I put it on to picture, my teacher said that it could have big errors there.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Tegalad said:
galactical latitude/longtitude to linear/geographical coordinates
Do you mean equatorial coordinates (right ascension and declination) to geographic (latitude and longitude)?
 
Bandersnatch said:
Do you mean equatorial coordinates (right ascension and declination) to geographic (latitude and longitude)?
In stellarium there are equatorial coordinates and galactical coordinates. I was using galactical coordinates. How should I convert equatorial coordinates to geographic?
 
In equatorial coordinates, declination corresponds* to latitude in geographic. Right ascension in terms of relative position corresponds to longitude expressed in hours, i.e. 360° is 24 hours (so 1 h is 360°/24=15°, and so on). The difference between RA and longitude is in where the 0th line is drawn (Greenwich on Earth vs vernal equinox on the celestial sphere), but as long as you're only interested in graphing relative positions of the stars and the pyramids, that should not interest you.

*in terms of a projection of one spherical surface onto the other
 
  • Like
Likes Tegalad
Bandersnatch said:
In equatorial coordinates, declination corresponds* to latitude in geographic. Right ascension in terms of relative position corresponds to longitude expressed in hours, i.e. 360° is 24 hours (so 1 h is 360°/24=15°, and so on). The difference between RA and longitude is in where the 0th line is drawn (Greenwich on Earth vs vernal equinox on the celestial sphere), but as long as you're only interested in graphing relative positions of the stars and the pyramids, that should not interest you.

*in terms of a projection of one spherical surface onto the other
Thank you very much
 
It seems that I was doing it wrong. How could I change the position of Orions belt projection on Earth to the place of pyramids and then tighten it to match Giza pyramids?
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Back
Top