Converting Polar to Cartesian - Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter chap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Polar
chap
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm back studying after a couple of years out and have become a little rusty. currently learning about the J operator.

I have no problem converting Cartesian to Polar, but struggle to convert Polar to Cartesian. Some basic examples and a step by step guide would be appreciated.


Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Given (r,\theta ) you can get (x,y) by the following procedure:

x=r\cos(\theta)
y=r\sin(\theta)
 
Simple now you've pointed it out.

Thanks, that helps a lot.
 
chap said:
Simple now you've pointed it out.

Thanks, that helps a lot.

Easier than cartesian to polar, huh?
 
I know, I was thinking the same thing. :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top