Converting Polar to Cartesian - Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter chap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Polar
AI Thread Summary
Converting from Polar to Cartesian coordinates involves using the formulas x = r*cos(θ) and y = r*sin(θ). The discussion highlights that this process is straightforward once the formulas are understood. Participants express relief at the simplicity of the conversion compared to the reverse process. The exchange emphasizes the clarity gained from discussing basic examples. Overall, the conversion from Polar to Cartesian is deemed easier than the opposite.
chap
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm back studying after a couple of years out and have become a little rusty. currently learning about the J operator.

I have no problem converting Cartesian to Polar, but struggle to convert Polar to Cartesian. Some basic examples and a step by step guide would be appreciated.


Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Given (r,\theta ) you can get (x,y) by the following procedure:

x=r\cos(\theta)
y=r\sin(\theta)
 
Simple now you've pointed it out.

Thanks, that helps a lot.
 
chap said:
Simple now you've pointed it out.

Thanks, that helps a lot.

Easier than cartesian to polar, huh?
 
I know, I was thinking the same thing. :smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top