Convex set for similarity constraint

Squatchmichae
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am trying to ultimately find the projector onto a convex set defined in a non-explicit way, for a seismic processing application.

The signals in question are members of some Hilbert Space H and the set membership requires that they must correlate with each other above some scalar [itex]\rho[/itex], given that the known signal [itex]\textbf{w}[/itex] is in the set. Symbolically, I want to find a projector [itex]\textit{P}[/itex] onto the convex set [itex]\textit{C}[/itex]:

\begin{equation}

C = \left\{\mathbf{u}(t) : \left\langle \hat{\mathbf{u}}(t),\hat{\mathbf{v}}(t) \right\rangle \geq\rho_{0}, \forall \mathbf{v}(t) \in C, \quad where \quad \mathbf{w}(t) \in C \right\},

\end{equation}

Any intermediate help is appreciated, i.e., is there an equivalent way to formulate this set, that make finding the projector easier?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a bit confused by how C references itself in its definition.
 
Office_Shredder said:
I'm a bit confused by how C references itself in its definition.

I understand the confusion--that is what makes the defining characteristic a little awkward. The basic idea is this: each element in the convex set [itex]\textit{C}[/itex] must correlate with every other element above [itex]\rho[/itex]. But we also know that a given (known) element [itex]\textbf{w}(t)[/itex] is contained in [itex]\textit{C}[/itex]. Is that less confusing of a statement?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
17K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K