Conveying inner product with words

qubyte
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was wondering about the proper way to say, \langleA|B\rangle .

I have recently heard, "The inner product of A with B." But I'm not sure if this is correct. Does anyone know the proper order in which to place A and B in the sentence?

As a simple example: Suppose you're speaking with someone on the phone. Then one way to convey the expression, \frac{x^{2} + 2d}{5} , is "x squared plus two d all over five."
How would you do the same with \langleA|B\rangle ?

If someone could also point me in the direction of some literature where this is exemplified, that would very kind.
I must have missed this some where along the line, and I can't seem to find a solid answer anywhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inner product of A and B with A in the first slot. This order qualifier is necessary in the case of a complex vector space. For reals the order doesn't matter.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TheOldHag said:
The inner product of A and B with A in the first slot. This order qualifier is necessary in the case of a complex vector space. For reals the order doesn't matter.

I appreciate the response. Anywhere I may be able to find an explicit example of this?
 
Since western languages are read and written from left to right, I don't think "the inner product of A and B" is any more ambiguous than "A minus B," which nobody would interpret as meaning ##B-A##.

Of course if you are in an environment where left-to-right writing is not a universal rule, you might need to be more careful.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top