Cooked vs Raw: Uncovering the Nutritional Advantages

  • Thread starter Thread starter FulhamFan3
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Cooking food can enhance its nutritional value by breaking down strong cell structures, which allows for better nutrient release. For example, collard greens have minimal nutritional benefits when consumed raw, but cooking them significantly increases the availability of vitamins and minerals. The impact of cooking on nutrient retention and calorie content varies depending on the type of food, highlighting that not all foods provide the same nutritional benefits in their raw versus cooked forms.
FulhamFan3
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Is there an advantage to eating cooked food? I'm asking this in terms of nutrition and what your metabolism does and not in the aspect of taste or killing diseases.

Basically do you get the same calories and vitamins with a cooked piece of food as oppose to its raw form?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It depends on what it is. Some vegetables like collard greens have very little nutriitional value raw.

Because of the strong cell structure of the greens more vitamins and minerals are released after being cooked. This is because cooking breaks down the cells and releases the nutrients.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
9K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Back
Top