Cool ways of defining functions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter TylerH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cool Functions
TylerH
Messages
729
Reaction score
0
f(x)=x^3
or
f:\Re \rightarrow \Re
r \rightarrow r^3

What are some other ways to define functions? Exotic and extraneous as possible. :wink:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I suppose that you now a cool way to define the function f(x) = ln(x)
 
Yeah, that was my first example. :)
 
TylerH said:
f(x)=x^3
or
f:\Re \rightarrow \Re
r \rightarrow r^3

What are some other ways to define functions? Exotic and extraneous as possible. :wink:
Actually, f(x)= x^3 does NOT define a function because it does not specify the domain. You might well assume that the real numbers is intended but why not the complex numbers.

As for the second form, it says too much. You don't have to specify that the range is the set of real numbers because if the domain is the real numbers and the "formula" is x^3, the range must be the set of real numbers.

If you want an exotic way of defining functions, how about this:
Bessel's function, of order 0 and of the "first kind" is defined as
"The function satisfying Bessel's equation of order 0,
x^2\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}+ x\frac{dy}{dx}+ x^2y= 0
and the initial conditions y(0)= 1, y'(0)= 0."

Or the "Lambert W function" which is defined as
"The inverse function to f(x)= xe^x".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top