Cool ways of defining functions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter TylerH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cool Functions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores various unconventional ways to define mathematical functions, starting with the cubic function f(x) = x^3. It highlights the importance of specifying the domain, noting that without it, the definition may be incomplete. The conversation also mentions that certain definitions can be overly detailed, such as stating the range when it can be inferred. Exotic examples provided include Bessel's function, defined by its differential equation and initial conditions, and the Lambert W function, which serves as the inverse of f(x) = xe^x. Overall, the thread emphasizes creativity in function definitions while maintaining mathematical rigor.
TylerH
Messages
729
Reaction score
0
f(x)=x^3
or
f:\Re \rightarrow \Re
r \rightarrow r^3

What are some other ways to define functions? Exotic and extraneous as possible. :wink:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I suppose that you now a cool way to define the function f(x) = ln(x)
 
Yeah, that was my first example. :)
 
TylerH said:
f(x)=x^3
or
f:\Re \rightarrow \Re
r \rightarrow r^3

What are some other ways to define functions? Exotic and extraneous as possible. :wink:
Actually, f(x)= x^3 does NOT define a function because it does not specify the domain. You might well assume that the real numbers is intended but why not the complex numbers.

As for the second form, it says too much. You don't have to specify that the range is the set of real numbers because if the domain is the real numbers and the "formula" is x^3, the range must be the set of real numbers.

If you want an exotic way of defining functions, how about this:
Bessel's function, of order 0 and of the "first kind" is defined as
"The function satisfying Bessel's equation of order 0,
x^2\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}+ x\frac{dy}{dx}+ x^2y= 0
and the initial conditions y(0)= 1, y'(0)= 0."

Or the "Lambert W function" which is defined as
"The inverse function to f(x)= xe^x".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top