Coordinate transformation of a tensor in 2 dimensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on transforming a symmetric tensor T_{\mu\nu} in two dimensions to complex coordinates z and \overline{z}. The transformation involves using a matrix U to relate the tensor components in the new basis. Participants express difficulty in obtaining the correct tensor components after transformation, specifically struggling with the application of the transformation matrices. The correct transformation matrices are identified, but confusion arises regarding the lowering of indices and the resulting tensor components. The key issue appears to be in the calculation of the transformed tensor components and ensuring the correct application of symmetry properties.
physicus
Messages
52
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Given a symmetric tensor T_{\mu\nu} on the flat Euclidean plane (g_{\mu\nu}=\delta_{\mu\nu}), we want to change to complex coordinates z=x+iy, \,\overline{z}=x-iy.
Show, that the components of the tensor in this basis are given by:
T_{zz}=\frac{1}{4}(T_{00}-2iT_{10}-T_{11}),\, T_{\overline{z}\overline{z}}=\frac{1}{4}(T_{00}+2iT_{10}-T_{11}),\, T_{\overline{z}z}=T_{z\overline{z}}=\frac{1}{4}(T_{00}+T_{11})


Homework Equations


T_{\mu\nu}=T_{\nu\mu}
T'_{\alpha\beta} = U_{\alpha}{}^{\mu}U_{\beta}{}^{\nu}T_{\mu\nu}


The Attempt at a Solution


In priciple, this should be an easy linear algebra problem. I just don't get the right result.
I use T'for the tensor in the new coordinates. Then, there should be a transformation matrix U, s.t.
T'_{\alpha\beta} = U_{\alpha}{}^{\mu}U_{\beta}{}^{\nu}T_{\mu\nu}
But what is U? Neiter with the transformation matrix from the new to the old coordinates \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 \\ i & -i\end{pmatrix} nor with the transformation matrix from the old to the new coordinates \begin{pmatrix}\frac{1}{2} & \frac{-i}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{i}{2} \end{pmatrix} it is working. What am I doing wrong?

physicus
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to say without seeing the calculation. You do remember that there are two transformation matrices, right? (one for each index)
 
Thanks, but I still get a wrong result.

The matrix U = \begin{pmatrix}\frac{1}{2} & \frac{-i}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{i}{2} \end{pmatrix} transforms from the old basis x,y to the new basis z=x+iy, \overline{z}=x-iy.
The original metrix is g_{\mu\nu}=\delta_{\mu\nu}. The transformed metric is g'_{\mu\nu}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix}
Therefore, the tensor in the new basis is given by
T'^{\alpha}{}_\beta = U^{\alpha}{}_\mu T^{\mu}{}_\nu (U^{-1})^\nu{}_\beta = \begin{pmatrix}\frac{1}{2}T^0{}_0+\frac{1}{2}T^1{}_1 & \frac{1}{2}T^0{}_0-\frac{i}{2}T^0{}_1- {\frac{i}{2}}T^1{}_0-T^1{}_1 \\ \frac{1}{2}T^0{}_0+ \frac{i}{2}T^0{}_1+ \frac{i}{2}T^1{}_0-T^1{}_1 & \frac{1}{2}T^0{}_0+\frac{1}{2}T^1{}_1 \end{pmatrix}

Now, I use the metric to lower the indices. Since the original metric ist Euclidean one can simply lower the indices of Twithout further factors, but not for T'.
T'_{00}=g'_{00}T'^0{}_0+g'_{01}T'^1{}_0 = \frac{1}{2}T'^1{}_0 = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}T_{00}+ \frac{i}{2}T_{01}+ \frac{i}{2}T_{10}-T_{11}) = \frac{1}{4}(T_{00}+2iT_{10}-T_{11})
I have used the symmetry of T_{\mu\nu}.
The plus sign in the middle of the expression is noch correct. Does someone see my mistake?

physicus
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top