ice109 said:
i don't think you understand me because my question was more epistemological than anything else. if you are presented with a statement whose truth value you are unable to evaluate can you still be skeptical?
I think I understand what you are asking, ice. The level of skepticism varies a lot from person-to-person, and not just in terms of scientific issues.
Take a similar example. Several times I have been approached by someone, say, in a parking lot. They claim that their car has run out of gas about 1/2 mile away, but they forgot their wallet that morning, and are trying to get to work. They just need about $5 more to be able to buy gas and get to work.
Now, the first time this happened to me, I was not very skeptical, and was happy to help out someone trying to get to work. But the 2nd and 3rd time that something similar happened to me like this, I was more skeptical, and used a different approach. One time I asked them their license plate number, and then several other questions, and then their license plate number again. Guess what? And another time, I offered to give them a ride to their car, verify that it was out of gas, and then shuttle them to the gas station to get a can of gas and back to their car. Guess what?
So I've learned over the years to be a bit skeptical when hearing
any story. And to be even more skeptical when I'm hearing a story 2nd or 3rd hand, and from a source who cannot judge the veracity of the story themselves.