How Do Copper, Iron, Aluminium, and Zinc Correlate in Properties and Uses?

AI Thread Summary
Copper, iron, aluminum, and zinc exhibit distinct properties that correlate with their positions on the periodic table, influencing their uses in various applications. Key periodic trends such as electronegativity and atomic radius play a significant role in determining these properties. For example, copper is known for its excellent conductivity, while aluminum is lightweight and resistant to corrosion. Iron's strength makes it vital in construction, and zinc is commonly used for galvanization. Understanding these correlations can enhance knowledge of material selection based on their properties and applications.
nofx
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The question basically states write a brief overview of the correlation between the properties and uses for copper, iron, aluminium and zinc.

Now I know this sounds like a simple research task, it's supposed to relate to periodic trends and their placing on the table. It's in this area that I've had no luck.

If anyone cares to explain or has a site that does I'd be really grateful :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nofx said:
The question basically states write a brief overview of the correlation between the properties and uses for copper, iron, aluminium and zinc.
Now I know this sounds like a simple research task, it's supposed to relate to periodic trends and their placing on the table. It's in this area that I've had no luck.
If anyone cares to explain or has a site that does I'd be really grateful :smile:
Simply find out what these periodic trends are and you will find your answer. (ie. electronegativity, atomic radius, etc.)
http://www.webelements.com/
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top