Coriolis and different refererence frames

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wondering
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coriolis Frames
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the Coriolis force from both inertial and rotating reference frames. When an object is dropped, it experiences eastward deflection due to its initial tangential velocity, which is greater than that of the ground, leading to an increase in angular momentum as it descends. For a ball thrown straight up, the westward deflection during ascent is countered by the eastward deflection during descent, resulting in a net westward landing position that can be calculated once and doubled. The conversation also references a Java applet for visualizing the motion of launched objects in different coordinate systems. Overall, the Coriolis effect significantly influences the trajectory of moving objects on Earth.
Wondering
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am stuck on the coriolis force. If an object is dropped how do I get the eastward deflection when looking from an inertial frame? I know how from the rotating frame but for some reason I am stuck, i.e. what terms to use.
Also, if I throw a ball straight up from Earth what is the westward deflection, do I solve this twice? Once for the ball moving up and then again once it is at the max height falling down?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wondering said:
Hello,
I am stuck on the coriolis force. If an object is dropped how do I get the eastward deflection when looking from an inertial frame?
What you see there initially is the ball that has the same angular velocity but a higher tangential velocity than the ground. As it descends it outruns the ground due to that higher tangential velocity. The angular velocity of the ball increases to preserve it's angular momentum.
Wondering said:
Also, if I throw a ball straight up from Earth what is the westward deflection, do I solve this twice? Once for the ball moving up and then again once it is at the max height falling down?
Yes the west acceleration during rise is canceled by the east acceleration during fall, so the ball lands with zero velocity in the east-west direction, but in a point west to the throw position. The defection is the same during both phases, so you just calculate it once and multiply by two.
 
Last edited:
Wondering said:
Hello,
I am stuck on the coriolis force. If an object is dropped how do I get the eastward deflection when looking from an inertial frame? I know how from the rotating frame but for some reason I am stuck, i.e. what terms to use.
Also, if I throw a ball straight up from Earth what is the westward deflection, do I solve this twice? Once for the ball moving up and then again once it is at the max height falling down?
Thank you

I won't give you the derivations, but you can check your results against the following Java applet that is available on my website. http://www.cleonis.nl/physics/ejs/ballistics_and_orbits_simulation.php"
The Coriolis effect is the main subject of my website. (http://www.cleonis.nl)

The applet http://www.cleonis.nl/physics/ejs/ballistics_and_orbits_simulation.php" shows the motion of a launched object. The panel on the left shows the motion with respect to the inertial coordinate system, the panel on the right shows the motion with respect to the coordinate system that is co-rotating with the Earth.

You can launch from any latitude, you can launch at any angle (eastward, westward etc), you can launch at any elevation, and you can specify the nozzle velocity (zero for release to free motion, high speed for launch with a gun.)

If memory serves me the textbook 'Classical dynamics' by (authors Stephen Thornton and Jerry Marion) offers several discussions.

If an object is dropped from a high tower, why does it not land at the base of the tower? Answer: (simplified version that neglects air resistance effects). Once the object is released it is effectively in orbital motion. (An orbit that will be shortlived, as it intersects the Earth's surface.)
There is Kepler's law for orbital motion: when an orbiting object is pulled closer to its primary its speed increases, (in such a way that equal areas are swept out in equal intervals of time.)
An extreme example is the orbit of Halley's comet: during the part of the orbit that the comet is falling to the center of the solar system the comet is gaining speed all the time. Halley's comet sweeps around the Sun, and then starts climbing outward again. Moving against the pull of the Sun the comet is losing velocity all the time.

Returning to the example of releasing an object from the top of a high tower: the Earth's gravity is pulling the object in, so the angular velocity of the object increases. The Java applet I mentioned is also designed to illustrate the 'object released from high tower' scenario.

In this particular case the fastest calculation strategy to obtain the motion with respect to the inertial coordinate system is to apply conservation of angular momentum.

Cleonis
http://www.cleonis.nl
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top